Morales v. PerezMorales v. Perez
Waldemar MORALES, Appellant,
v.
Edelma PEREZ, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Jose Miguel Perez, Deceased, et al., Appellees.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Curtis L. Jones, Jr., Miami, for appellant.
Sweetapple & Kamilar and Mark Kamilar, Miami, for appellees.
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Morales, the defendant below, appeals from a default judgment determining the issue of liability in favor of the plaintiff. The trial court entered the default at a pretrial conference as a sanction for the *394 defendant's repeated and willful violations of the discovery rules. We affirm.
The record reveals numerous failures on the part of Morales to comply with orders relating to discovery, concluding with the failure of his attorney to appear at a scheduled pretrial conference. It was within the discretion of the trial court to enter a default as a sanction for these discovery violations.[1] Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.200(b). See Mercer v. Raine,
NOTES
Notes
[1] Counsel for appellant the third or fourth in the case was not involved in the discovery violations which caused striking of the defenses.