History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moose v. . Marks
116 N.C. 785
N.C.
1895
Check Treatment

It is agreed all around that the debtor may direct the application of his payment, and on his failure to do so the creditor may make the application, and if he fails then the law will make it to the debt with least security.

Here, the plaintiff held a note for $600 in his right as executor against defendant and another for a less amount as assignee in his individual right; the latter holding, however, was unknown to the defendant. The plaintiff applies by letter for $75 "as one of the heirs is in a strain and needs it very much." The defendant answers, "Find check for $57.50. I will send you some more as soon as I can raise it," which was equivalent to saying, "I send you this amount to relieve the heir in distress," and in legal effect was a request to apply it on the $600 note, and good faith required that it be done.

Judgment Reversed.

Cited: Young v. Alford, 118 N.C. 220; French v. Richardson, 167 N.C. 44. *Page 459

(788)

Case Details

Case Name: Moose v. . Marks
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 5, 1895
Citation: 116 N.C. 785
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.