6 Ky. 97 | Ky. Ct. App. | 1813
OPINION of the Court, by
This tsras an action of assumpsit, brought bv the defendants in error, against the plaintiffs, upon a contract made with the intestate, Benjamin Moore, dec’d. The de fendants pleaded jointly, and in substance, non assump-sit and plene admini&travit. Issues were joined on
The only question whichis deemed necessary for con-side ration in this cause, is, whether the circuit court erred in withholding the instructions to the jury asked ? We are of opinion the decision was erroneous. Had the defendants pleaded separate pleas of plene adminis-travit, there could exist no doubt: for the rule in such a case is settled, that one executor shall not be charged with the wrong or devastavit of his companion, and shall be no farther liable than for the assets which came to his hands — 3 Bac. Abr. 31, letter D, 2. The same reason requires that the rule should equally apply to the case of administrators ; and it is conceived the circumstance of the plea being joint, as in this case, do£s not change the case : for although it is a rule in pleading, that if two defendants join in a plea which is sufficient for one, but not for the other, the plea is bad as to both defendants ; yet this rule does not apply to the case of a joint plea of plene administravit by executors, and that in such a plea each is only liable to pay the assets found by the jury to be in his own hands — 1 Chit, on Plead. 545 —1 Saund. 336, n 10.
We are of opinion, therefore, the court erred in not giving the instructions asked, and in giving the instructions which they did to the jury. The judgment must be reversed with costs ; the cause remanded for a new trial to be had on the issue joined on the plea of plene administravit, before judgment is entered on the verdict of the jury on the issue to the plea of non assumpsit.