(after stating the facts). It is the contention of the complainant that the language of the reservation, construed in the light of the circumstances sur
Inasmuch as everything standing upon the land was cut except underbrush, it is unnecessary to again define what is meant by the word “ timber.” That was done by this court in the case of Huron Land Co. v. Davison, 131 Mich. 87 (90 N. W. 1034), and again in the recent case of Balderson v. Seeley, 160 Mich. 186 (135 N. W. 37).
The bill of complaint was properly dismissed, and the decree is affirmed, with costs to defendants.