History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Voss
17 F. Cas. 707
U.S. Circuit Court for the Dis...
1804
Check Treatment

At the prayer of the defendant’s counsel,

THE COURT

(KILTT, Chief Judge, absent) gave the following direction to the jury: That if they should be of opinion, from the evidence, that the book produced is the original entry of the sale and delivery, or if they should be of opinion, from the evidence, that a former entry had been made, but that the same is now lost or destroyed, and that this book was truly copied from the original entry by the witness, then this book is evidence; but if they should be of opinion that prior entries exist which are not produced, then this book is not evidence. Peake, Ev. 136; Church v. Perkins, 3 Term R. 749.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Voss
Court Name: U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
Date Published: Jul 15, 1804
Citation: 17 F. Cas. 707
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.