History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. State
241 So. 2d 868
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1970
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant seeks review of a judgment of conviction and sentence based upon his pleas of guilty of the offenses of aggravated assault. It is appellant’s contention that the lower court erred in not determining before it accepted his guilty pleas that such pleas were voluntarily, knowingly and understandingly made. ''

We have given full consideration to the record and briefs of the parties and it appearing therefrom that appellant has failed to demonstrate that prejudicial error was committed in the proceedings below, the judgment appealed herein is affirmed upon the authority of McPherson v. State, 237 So.2d 18 (Fla.App. 1st, 1970). This holding is without prejudice to appellant’s right to challenge the voluntariness of his plea and the validity of the judgment based thereon pursuant to the procedure authorized by Criminal Procedure Rule 1.850, 33 F.S.A.

Affirmed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and SPECTOR and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 15, 1970
Citation: 241 So. 2d 868
Docket Number: No. O-94
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.