Moore v. StateMoore v. State
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Gtuerry
GtUerry, J.
J. A. Mitchell, P. H. Mitchell, for plaintiff in error.
J. Cedi Davis, solicitor-general, contra.
Presence of the defendant at a still in actual operation and producing whisky; his flight upon being discovered thereat, together with evidence that he was “toting wood” and firing the furnace, are amply sufficient to support a conviction of manufacturing liquor.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, C. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.