History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Schultz
12 N.J. 329
| N.J. | 1953
|
Check Treatment
12 N.J. 329 (1953)
96 A.2d 732

BENJAMIN MOORE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ERNEST SCHULTZ, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued April 27, 1953.
Decided May 11, 1953.

Mr. Michael A. Dwyer argued the cause for the appellant (Messrs. Doughty & Dwyer, attorneys).

Mr. Seymour A. Smith argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Hein & Smith, attorneys; Mr. Ira D. Dorian on the brief).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Jayne in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice VANDERBILT, and Justices HEHER, OLIPHANT, WACHENFELD, BURLING, JACOBS and BRENNAN — 7.

For reversal — None.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Schultz
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date Published: May 11, 1953
Citation: 12 N.J. 329
Court Abbreviation: N.J.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.