Moore v. . R. R.

Jun 5, 1872
Reporters:
Before:
Rodman (per curiam)

The Clerk of the Superior ‍‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‍Court of Mecklenburg has no right to issue a summons returnable to the Superior Court of Cabarrus. Howerton v. Tate, 66 N.C. 431; Laws 1868-‘69, ‍‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‍ch. 76, sec. 2.

The defendant nevertheless appeared and answered in bar. We are of opinion that the irregularity was thereby waived. If no summons at ‍‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‍all had been issued, the filing of a complaint and answer would have constituted a cause in Court.

Judgment reversed, and case remanded, to be proceeded ‍‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‍in according to law.

PER CURIAM. Reversed.

Cited: Fleming v. Patterson, 99 N.C. 405; Cherry v. Lilly, 113 N.C. 28;Davison v. Land Co., 118 N.C. 369; Webb v. Hicks, ‍‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​​‌‌‌​​​​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌​‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​​‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‍125 N.C. 205;McClure v. Fellows, 131 N.C. 510; Harris v. Bennett, 160 N.C. 342.