History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
922 A.2d 882
Pa.
2007
Check Treatment

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The order of the Commonwealth Court is VACATED, and the matter is remanded for reconsideration in light of Pa. R.A.P. 1503.1

Notes

. The Commonwealth Court’s order denying reconsideration states as follows:

To the extent that petitioner requests this court to address the claims he raises in connection to his parole revocation and respondent's denial of administrative relief, such claims must be raised in a timely petition for review addressed to this court’s appellate jurisdiction. Pa.R.A.P. 1503, however, embodies a safe-harbor rule that requires the court to treat an improvidently filed original jurisdiction action as a matter raised within the court’s appellate jurisdiction, assuming that it was filed within the relevant appeal period. To the extent that there are ambiguities in the original filing, under the rule, the appellate court may require that the papers be clarified by amendment.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: May 31, 2007
Citation: 922 A.2d 882
Docket Number: Appeal No. 112 MAP 2006
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In