History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Peacock
94 Ga. 523
Ga.
1894
Check Treatment

On August 3, 1891, the children of Elizabeth Jane Moore and B. T. Moore filed their petition against Peacock as administrator of Rozar, alleging an indebtedness *524of $1,400. On demurrer for want of a cause of action, the petition was dismissed. It shows that on July 21, 1875, lot of land 123 in the 19th district of Dodge county was set apart as a homestead to Elizabeth Jane Moore, now deceased, who was then living in a state of separation from her husband, and plaintiffs being then minors. They have reached their majority within the last four years. They were the beneficiaries of the homestead, and were entitled to the enjoyment of the same, and the profits, possession, use and occupation thereof, but were wrongfully deprived thereof by Hozar during his lifetime and during the fourteen years 1876-1889, he receiving the profits of the land for said time of the value of $100 per year, which his administrator, the defendant, refuses to pay.

DeLacy & Bishop, for plaintiffs. E. A. Smith, for defendant.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Peacock
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 23, 1894
Citation: 94 Ga. 523
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.