History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Olsness
245 U.S. 627
SCOTUS
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk, etc., Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137; (2) Butler v. *628Pennsylvania, 10 How. 402, 415, 416; Newton v. Commissioners, 100 U. S. 548, 559; Taylor v. Beckham, 178 U. S. 548; Wilson v. North Carolina, 169 U. S. 586; (3) Railroad Company v. County of Otoe, 16 Wall. 667, 676; Kies v. Lowrey, 199 U. S. 233; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; Heim v. McCall, 239 U. S. 175.

Mr. Aubrey Lawreftce for plaintiff in error. Mr. William Langer for defendants in error.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Olsness
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Nov 5, 1917
Citation: 245 U.S. 627
Docket Number: No. 280
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.