| Iowa | Jun 14, 1859
The motion to dismiss the appeal, was based upon two grounds:
First. That there was no judgment before the justice, from which an appeal could be taken.
Second. No appeal was allowed, or bond filed, within the time required by law, nor was there any bond accepted, attested or approved by the justice.
The justice’s transcript recites the cause of action, the names of the parties, the time of trial, and in a word, substantially all that is required to be set forth in his docket, by section 2269 of the Code, up to the verdict of the jury, and the judgment thereon. As to these, the entry is this: “The jury ver. We, the jury, after duo deliberation in the case wherein Thaddeus Moore is plaintiff, and John Manser is defendant, do find, that the plaintiff is entitled to the sum of twenty-seven dollars and a half, and costs of suit, and judgment was entered by me thereon accordingly.”
We think this was a judgment or a final adjudication j within the meaning of section 2328 of the Code, from which either party might appeal.
Several questions are made under the second ground of the motion:
First. Was the appeal bond filed in time ? Following the entry of judgment, the transcript states: “Whereupon the plaintiff give notice of appeal. Appeal bond filed and approved by me, on the 25th day of March, A. D. 1857.” The trial was on the 23d of that month. The transcript is marked filed in the office of the clerk of the District Court, April 29, 1857. Upon the appeal bond was this endorsement, signed by the justice: “Appeal bond filed and approved by me, this 25th day of May, A. D. 1857, and the appeal allowed.” Notice of appeal was received by the party serving it, on the 25th and served on the 27th of March.
To suppose that the bond was not filed with the justice, until May 25th, 1857, as is assumed and contended for by appellee, would be to lose sight of all parts of the record, except the endorsement. We must take all the record together, and when thus taken, we think it reasonably certain that it was filed March 25th, and not May 25th, 1857. The bond or recognizance was necessary to perfect the appeal, and until perfected, the justice had no right to file the transcript with the Clerk; and yet, according to appellee’s assumption, he did send up the transcript near one month before the appeal was thus perfected. Not only so, but the •Justice was not required to thus endorse the recognizance, but he is required to enter upon his docket, the proper date of “ the taking and allowance of an appeal.” This was done in this case, and from this entry the appeal was manifestly in time.
Second. Was the bond or recognizance properly attested, approved or accepted by the justice ? The argument made under this head, assumes that the undertaking of the party appealing, must be in exact conformity with the form given in section 2333, of the Code, and must be approved or at
Judgment reversed.
City of Dubuque vs. Rebman 1 Iowa 444" court="Iowa" date_filed="1855-12-15" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/city-of-dubuque-v-rebman-7090992?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7090992">1 Iowa 444: Griffin vs. Moss, 3 Ib. 261: Kimpson vs. Kimpson, 4 Ib. 340. An appeal lies from a judgment of nonsuit rendered by a justice of tlie peace. Gibson vs. Johnson, Ib. 463. Also from a judgment by confession, Troxel vs. Clarke, infra. An appeal will not lie from tlie verdict of a jury, upon which no judgment has been rendered by the justice. Kimble vs. Riggin, 2 G. Greene 245 : Guthrie vs. Humphrey, 7 Iowa, 23" court="Iowa" date_filed="1858-10-19" href="https://app.midpage.ai/document/guthrie-v-humphrey-7091486?utm_source=webapp" opinion_id="7091486">7 Iowa 23.