3 La. 524 | La. | 1832
delivered the opinion of the court.
The plaintiff is appellant from the judgment, by which the court sustained the defendant’s plea, and dismissed the petition, on the ground, that a stay of proceedings had been obtained by the defendant; and was still in force, at the time the petition was filed.
The appellant in this court, has urged, that the first judge erred, as he (the appellant) was not made a party (to the proceedings on the surrender) according to' law, and is not therefore, bound by these proceedings.
It appears, the plaintiff was duly placed on the insolvent’s schedule. He resides in the county of Attakapas, and the proceedings took place in the city of New-Orleans. The notary states in the preamble of the proces verbal of the creditors’ deliberations, that they have all been duly notified to attend the meeting, as well by personal summons, issued from the court and served upon each of them, by the sheriff of the parish of Orleans, as by public advertisements, inserted three times and more in the French and English languages, in two of the newspapers printed in the city.
The act of 1817, § 8. 2 Moreauis Digest, 426, prescribes the mode of citing creditors, and the meeting before the notary. Those who reside in the parish, in which the meeting is to be
The appellant resides in the county of Attakapas, i. e. in another parish than that in which the meeting was to take , „ , , place. He was, therefore, entitled to notice by a letter, addressed to him by the notary. This doe's not appear to have been done. We are, therefore, bound to say, he was not cited, consequently, not made a party to the proceedings, and cannot be bpun(j thereby>
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the Parish Court be annulled, avoided and reversed, and the case remanded for further proceedings according to law, the appellee paying costs in this court.
