History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Catawba Power Co.
46 S.E. 1004
S.C.
1904
Check Treatment

March 11, 1904. The opinion of the Court was delivered by We do not think this case can be distinguished in principle from Lynch v. Spartan Mills, 66 S.C. 12. The views there expressed are in accord with the decisions of other Courts. Monahan v. NorthwesternContracting Co., 84 Wis. 586, 54 N.W., 1025; Carey v.Ry. Co., 67 Wis. 608, 31 N.W., 163; Ry. Co. v. Templeton,87 Tex., 42; 26 S.W. 1066; Cox v. Providence Gas Co.,17 R.I. 199, 21 Atl., 344; Preston v. R.R. Co., 64 Vt., 280,25 Atl., 486. The motion to make the complaint more definite and certain should have been refused.

The judgment of this Court is, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be reversed.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Catawba Power Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of South Carolina
Date Published: Mar 11, 1904
Citation: 46 S.E. 1004
Court Abbreviation: S.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.