History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. Berrill
222 A.D. 825
N.Y. App. Div.
1928
Check Treatment

Judgment in favor of the respondent Ferguson & Son, Inc., reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, unless the said respondent shall elect, by filing a stipulation within ten days after the entry of the order herein, that a personal judgment in its favor may be entered against either Lillian Berrill or Thomas F. Berrill, but not against both; and, if such stipulation be filed, the said judgment in its favor is modified by "striking out all provisions relating to the validity and foreclosure of the mechanic’s lien filed by it and substituting in place thereof a provision that the said lien is invalid and that said respondents recover personal judgment for the amount of their *826claim in accordance with its election as so stipulated as aforesaid, and against the defendants William S. Moore, Sr., and Frank Mooney, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Young, Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. Berrill
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jan 15, 1928
Citation: 222 A.D. 825
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.