History
  • No items yet
midpage
MOORE v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
2:18-cv-07351
D.N.J.
May 4, 2023
Check Treatment
Docket
I. Introduction
II. Legal Standard
III. Discussion
a. Plaintiffs Do Not Demonstrate Good Cause Mandating an Extension of Time to Serve
b. Plaintiffs Have Not Persuaded the Court that a Discretionary Extension is Warranted
c. Plaintiffs Have Not Shown that the AZ Defendants Waived their Defense to Untimely Service
IV. Conclusion
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Exhibit A
Notes

IN RE: PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

2:17-MD-2789 (CCC)(LDW) (MDL 2789)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

May 4, 2023

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

CECCHI, District Judge.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

This Document Relates to: All cases listed in Exhibit A

OPINION AND ORDER

CECCHI, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter comes before the Court upon Case Management Order (“CMO“) No. 65, ECF No. 723, entered on December 2, 2021, which identified 1,535 cases in which AstraZeneca LP (“AZLP“), AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP (“AZPLP“), and Merck & Co. Inc. d/b/a Merck, Sharp & Dohme Corporation (“Merck“) (collectively, the “AZ Defendants“) alleged that service of the summons and complaint had not been effected and in which no proof of service appeared on the docket of the case. CMO No. 65 ordered Plaintiffs in those cases within thirty days to (1) establish that service was effected on the AZ Defendants identified in Exhibit A to CMO No. 65, as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure1 by filing proof of service, (2) voluntarily dismiss the AZ Defendants, or (3) show cause why the AZ Defendants should not be dismissed within thirty days of entry of the Order. CMO No. 65, at 2 CMO No. 65 ordered Plaintiffs to file their responses on the dockets of the individual cases, and permitted the AZ Defendants to oppose within thirty days of each plaintiff‘s response.2 Plaintiffs were specifically

advised that “[f]ailure to comply with the terms of this Order will result in the dismissal of the case as to the identified AZ Defendants.” CMO No. 65, at 2.

II. Legal Standard

Rule 4 governs the requirements regarding serving a summons. In particular, Rule 4(m) requires that “[i]f a defendant is not served 90 days after the complaint is filed, the court – on motion or on its own after notice to plaintiff – must dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). In thе Third Circuit, establishing good cause requires a “demonstration of good faith on the part of a party seeking an enlargement and some reasonable basis for noncompliance with the time specified in the rules.” MCI Telecomms. Corp., 71 F.3d at 1097.3 In the absence of a showing of good cause for failure timely to effect service, the Court has discretion either to dismiss a case or permit an extension. Id. at 1098 (citing Petrucelli v. Bohringer & Ratzinger, 46 F.3d 1298, 1305 (3d Cir. 1995)). It is the plaintiff‘s burden to demonstrate good cause for such failure to effectuate timely service or to persuade the Court to exercise its discretion and not dismiss the AZ Defendants from their cases. Spence v. Lahood, No. 11-3972, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15 (D.N.J. June 8, 2012) (citing McCurdy v. Am. Bd. of Plastic Surgery, 157 F.3d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1998)).

III. Discussion

As stated above, CMO No. 65 ordered the identified Plaintiffs within thirty days to either establish that service was properly effectuаted pursuant to Rule 4(m), voluntarily dismiss the AZ Defendants, or show cause why the AZ Defendants should not be dismissed. CMO No. 65 did not provide Plaintiffs with an extension of time to serve the Complaint, instead, it directed Plaintiffs to prove that service had in fact been effectuated or to “show cause why the AZ Defendants should not be dismissed.”

The 1,181 Plaintiffs in the cases identified on Exhibit A herein have failed to satisfy the requirements of CMO No. 65. Plaintiffs do not claim to have timely served the AZ Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m). See CMO No. 7, at § II.D (“Absent agreement of the parties or subsequent Order of the Court, service of process shall be effectuated as required under Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.“).4 While there is disagreement between Plaintiffs and the AZ Defendants concerning the fact or date of servicе in some of the cases here, it is undisputed that in the cases in which the AZ Defendants were served, service was effected only after CMO No. 65 was entered. In fact, of these 1,181 cases (and utilizing the earlier purported date of service in the event that the parties did not agree on the date of service), service was made between one to two years after the ninety-day period in Rule 4(m) in 9 cases; between two to three years after the ninety-day period in 228 cases; and between three to just over four years after the ninety-day period in 944 cases. Further, no Plaintiff here has dismissed the AZ Defendants from their case. Finally, as further elaborated below, Plaintiffs have not shown cause why the AZ Defendants should not

be dismissed. Accordingly, due to untimely service and lack of good cause shown, it is appropriate that the AZ Defendants be dismissed from the cases identified in Exhibit A.

a. Plaintiffs Do Not Demonstrate Good Cause Mandating an Extension of Time to Serve

Plaintiffs’ responses to CMO No. 65 do not demonstrate good cause excusing their lack of timely service pursuant to Rule 4(m). Good cause requires “a demonstration of good faith on the part of a party seeking an enlargement . . . and some reasonable basis for noncompliance with the time specified in the rules.” MCI Telecomms. Corp., 71 F.3d at 1097. To determine whether good cause exists, the Court considers “(1) reasonableness of plaintiff‘s efforts to serve (2) prejudice to the defendant by lack of timely service and (3) whether plaintiff moved for an enlargement of time to serve.” Id. The primary focus must always be on “the plaintiff‘s reasons for not complying with the time limit in the first place.” Id. Yet here, Plaintiffs have not even attempted to show good cause for their failure to timely serve or addressed the reasons for untimeliness. See, e.g., Pl. Lawrence Lucerne‘s Resp. to Orders to Show Cause Regarding Service of Process, at 22-24, No. 2:19-cv-04209, ECF No. 8 (“Lucerne Resp.“). Accordingly, as the Court further explains, Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate good cause for failure to timely serve in compliance with Rule 4(m).

As an initial matter, the Court notes that Plaintiffs responded to CMO No. 65 by filing virtually identical responses that do not reference thе AZ Defendants’ specific conduct. These responses attached an exhibit with limited information about the Plaintiffs’ individual cases, but did not include any documentation to support their assertions in the exhibit. The information in these exhibits filed by Plaintiffs includes such information as the date of alleged service (if any), whether a defendant had filed a notice of appearance, whether a defendant had filed a short form answer, whether a Plaintiff Fact Sheet had been uploaded to Marker Group, whether a Defense

Fact Sheet had been served, and whether a defendant had sent a deficiency letter related to the Plaintiff Fact Sheet. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp.; Pl. Michael Lopez‘s Resp. to Order tо Show Cause Regarding Service of Process, Ex. A, No. 2:18-cv-04494, ECF No. 15 (“Lopez Resp.“). In addition, Plaintiffs’ briefing does not address any reasons for the failure to timely serve and instead focuses on arguments concerning the AZ Defendants’ purported waiver of service and the Court‘s authority for discretionary extensions. See Houser v. Williams, No. 16-9072, 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43518, at *6 (D.N.J. Mar. 12, 2020) (finding dismissal warranted where plaintiff did not serve the complaint for months after an agreed-upon extension and then failed to detail any steps he took towards serving defendant within the extended time afforded by the court).

Turning to the factors for evaluating good cause, the first factor examines the reasonableness of the plaintiff‘s efforts to serve the complaint. As noted, Plaintiffs offer no еxplanation for the failure to timely serve, nor an adequate description of reasonable steps that Plaintiffs took to effect timely service as required by Rule 4(m). And none of the Plaintiffs at issue here were close to satisfying timely service under Rule 4(m). As previously stated, in all 1,181 cases, service was effected at least one year after the ninety-day period under Rule 4(m) had lapsed; indeed, in 944 cases, or approximately 80 percent, service was effected over three years after the ninety-day period under Rule 4(m) had lapsed. Given Plaintiffs’ lack of sufficient efforts to serve the complaint, this factor weighs heavily in favor of the AZ Defendants.

Under the second factor, the Court considers prejudice tо the AZ Defendants by lack of timely service. Here, Plaintiffs’ failure to serve caused the AZ Defendants to expend time and resources through investigation, consultation with opposing counsel, and advocating for and responding to case management orders – all to determine whether Plaintiffs intended to pursue litigation against them. W. Coasts Quartz Corp. v. M.E.C. Tech, Inc., 2017 WL 1944197, at *2

(D.N.J. May 9, 2017). Moreover, this Court has previously determined that the AZ Defendants had been prejudiced by the delayed service or non-service. See Order Regarding CMO No. 65, at 7, ECF No. 890. Given the prejudice to the AZ Defendants resulting from Plaintiffs’ failure to timely serve, this factor also cuts against good cause. And even if Plaintiffs had demonstrated lack of prejudice to the AZ Defendants, “absence of prеjudice alone can never constitute good cause to excuse late service.” MCI Telecomms Corp., 71 F.3d at 1097.

Finally, under the third factor, while Plaintiffs have now requested an extension of time to serve the AZ Defendants, they did so only after CMO No. 65 was entered, which was a year or more after the time to serve the AZ Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m) had lapsed. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp.; Lopez Resp. Plaintiffs have not explained why they did not request an extension of time to serve the AZ Defendants until after CMO No. 65 was entered by this Court. Accordingly, this factor similarly weighs in favor of the AZ Defendants and against Plaintiffs’ showing of good cause.

Considering the three factors used to evaluate whether good cause has been demonstrated, Plaintiffs hеre have not demonstrated good cause for their failure to serve the AZ Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m).

b. Plaintiffs Have Not Persuaded the Court that a Discretionary Extension is Warranted

In the absence of a showing of good cause mandating an extension to effectuate service, the Court nonetheless has discretion ‍​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍to either dismiss the case or permit extension. Because Plaintiffs have not established good cause, see supra, they must rely on the Court‘s discretionary authority to excuse failures to comply with Rule 4(m). See Edwards v. Hillman, 849 F. App‘x. 23, 25 (3d Cir. 2021) (citing Petrucelli, 46 F.3d at 1305). The Court‘s exercise of discretion in this area is guided by various factors, including: “actual notice of the legal action; prejudice to the

defendant; the statute of limitations on the underlying cаuses of action; the conduct of the defendant; and whether the plaintiff is represented by counsel, in addition to any other factor that may be relevant.” Chiang v. U.S. Small Bus. Admin., 331 Fed. App‘x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2009); see also Spence, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15. Here, considering these factors, Plaintiffs have not met their burden in persuading the Court that such discretion should be exercised under these circumstances.

With respect to the first factor—actual notice of the legal action—Plaintiffs argue that the AZ Defendants were on notice of their claims through their tolling agreement, which provided Plaintiffs time to obtain information about their claims before filing a complaint.5 However, the fact that a plaintiff was on the tolling agreement and may potentially bring a claim against the AZ Defendants or another dеfendant does not mean that the AZ Defendants had actual legal notice that a particular plaintiff would be pursuing his or her claim against the AZ Defendants in a legal action.

In re Asbestos Prod. Liab. Litig. (No. VI), upon which Plaintiffs rely for their argument that a court may extend the time for proper service if the defendant had “actual notice of the pending action,” is instructive. 2014 WL 1903904, at *1 (E.D. Pa., May 12, 2014); see Lucerne Resp. at 9-10 (citing Asbestos). The issue there concerned the appropriateness of a specific method of service by mail under Ohio law—not untimely service that occurred anywhere from one to four years past

the Rule 4(m) deadline. Notably, the court found that the defendants were on “actual legal notice” of the pending action because the plaintiffs provided prоof of a green card signed by the defendant, evidencing receipt of the original process papers by defendants’ counsel, which the court found acceptable under Ohio state law. Asbestos, 2014 WL 1903904, at *1. By contrast, Plaintiffs here have not offered any similar evidence of actual notice. Indeed, as the AZ Defendants argue, the tolling agreement “covered Plaintiffs who could not yet show proof of use as to a Defendant‘s product” and, moreover, did not identify a specific defendant or which PPI products were at issue as to a particular potential plaintiff. See, e.g., No. 19-cv-04209, ECF No. 10 at 10 n.3. Therefore, Plaintiffs’ reliance on Asbestos is misplaced and they have not demonstrated that the AZ Defendants had actual notice of pending litigation.

Turning to prejudice to the defendant—the second factor—the Court reiterates its analysis when discussing the same factor in the context of good cause. See supra III.a (noting the AZ Defendants expended time and resources through their repeated attempts to determine whether Plaintiffs intended to pursue litigation against them, including their own independent inquiries, as well as meetings with counsel and the special master). Further, this Court has previously found in this MDL (with respect to a different defendant) that “[w]asted time and resources and inconvenience standing alone may constitute sufficient prejudice to warrant dismissal.” CMO No. 63 at 7 (citing Miller v. Advocare, LLC, No. 12-01069, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71451, at *8-9 (D.N.J. May 21, 2013). Accordingly, this factor weighs against Plaintiffs’ request.

Regarding thе statute of limitations, the third factor, Plaintiffs argue that the applicable statute of limitations in most, if not all, of the actions subject to CMO No. 65 has expired. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at 21. However, “the expiration of the statute of limitations does not require the court to extend the time for service, as the court has discretion to dismiss the case even if the

refiling of the action is barred.” MCI Telecomms. Corp., 71 F.3d at 1098. Given the length of time between filing and service in the cases of these Plaintiffs—in some cases over four years—Plaintiffs’ argument that the potential lapse of the statute of limitations warrants extension is not compelling. Relatedly, Plaintiffs have not alleged that the AZ Defendants engaged in any conduct to impede or frustrate timely service. See Spence, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15 (fourth fаctor). These factors thus militate against a discretionary extension as well.

The final factor guiding the Court‘s discretion examines whether the plaintiff is represented by counsel. See Spence, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80015, at *15. Plaintiffs here are all represented by counsel. And, in this context, “[e]ven when delay [in service] results from inadvertence of counsel, it need not be excused.” Petrucelli, 46 F.3d at 1307. This factor thus also weighs against a discretionary extension.

Weighing all of the above factors, the Court is not persuaded that exercising its discretion to grant an extension to effectuate service on the AZ Defendants is warranted. Moreover, in addition to the factors counseling against an extension, the Court‘s conclusion is further supported by Plaintiffs’ failure to provide аn explanation as to why they did not timely serve the AZ Defendants.6

c. Plaintiffs Have Not Shown that the AZ Defendants Waived their Defense to Untimely Service

Plaintiffs generally assert that the AZ Defendants waived any defense related to untimely service by virtue of their conduct in this MDL litigation. Plaintiffs argue that dismissal of their

claims against the AZ Defendants is inappropriate in those cases where (1) the AZ Defendants filed a motion to dismiss without raising service; (2) the AZ Defendants either filed an answer without raising service or answered before service; or (3) the AZ Defendants manifested some intention to defend the case through the AZ Defendants’ conduct. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at § IV.B; Lopez Resp. at § IV.B. For the below reasons, the Court finds that the AZ Defеndants have not waived their defense to untimely service.

The Court first turns to Plaintiffs’ argument that the AZ Defendants waived their defense to lack of service in those cases where the AZ Defendants filed a motion to dismiss for purported failure to comply with the tolling agreement without specifically raising the defense. However, the AZ Defendants did not raise service in their motions to dismiss because an alternate procedure, proposed and agreed upon by the parties, was set forth in a stipulated court order, with their defenses expressly preserved by CMO No. 7. See CMO No. 7, ECF No. 112, at 7 (“Defendants also reserve all rights to move to dismiss . . . under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule[] 12. Defendants shall only be permitted to file said motions to dismiss subject to leave of this Cоurt.“). CMO No. 7 thus expressly restricted defendants from moving to dismiss individual plaintiffs under Rule 12 absent leave of this Court. Indeed, the federal rules bar a defendant from later moving to dismiss for insufficient service of process only when the party “could have raised these objections in their [earlier] motion to dismiss the complaint.” Denkins v. William Penn Sch. Dist., No. 20-02228, 2020 WL 5880132, at *3 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2020); accord Wright & Miller, 5C Fed. Prac. & Proc. Civ. § 1391 (“If one or more of these defenses are omitted from the initial motion but were ‘then available’ to the movant, they are permanently lost.“). In filing their authorized dismissal motions pursuant to the tolling agreement and CMO No. 7, the AZ Defendants did not have leave to raise any other defense, including insufficient service as to a particular case. Having understood

and agreed that such motions were to be deferred to a later date and with leave of the Court, it is not correct that the AZ Defendants, or any other defendant, waived their defense of service by failing to argue it in their motions to dismiss related to purported violations of the tolling agreement.

Plaintiffs’ next argument—that the AZ Defendants waived service either by filing an answer without raising service or by answering before service—is similarly unavailing. Plaintiffs assert that, as a general matter, waiver of service may occur where a defendant files an answer as its first responsive pleading and the answer fails to plead the defense. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at 7, 13. Accordingly, Plaintiffs argue that there are three potential scenarios where service hаs been waived by answer. First, Plaintiffs claim that in any case where the AZ Defendants filed a short form answer, service was waived because the short form answer simply incorporated the AZ Defendants’ initial long form answer. This, Plaintiffs maintain, is because the long form answer did not assert the defense of lack of service. See, e.g., id. at 14. Second, since a defendant‘s notice of appearance in a specific case may serve as a short form answer, see Case Management Order No. 27 (ECF No. 265), Plaintiffs contend that a notice of appearance after service is functionally the same as a short form answer—it incorporates the long form answer, which does not assert the defense of lаck of service. Finally, Plaintiffs argue that a notice of appearance before service waives this defense under the terms of Case Management Order No. 27 for cases filed after September 24, 2018. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp. at 8; see also CMO No. 27, at § 1.A.

As an initial matter, Plaintiffs’ individual submissions here do not assert that the AZ Defendants filed a short form answer in any of their cases, and the dockets confirm no such short form answers exist. See, e.g., Lucerne Resp., Ex. A; Lopez Resp., Ex. A; see generally No. 2:19-cv-04209; No. 2:18-cv-04494. Plaintiffs’ first argument is thus inapplicable to the cases listed in

Exhibit A. Similarly, for the cases which are subject to CMO No. 27‘s provision that a notice of appearance before service waives the defеnse (i.e., cases filed on or after September 24, 2018), the dockets clearly reflect that, to the extent the AZ Defendants filed a Notice of Appearance, it was not until after service was (untimely) effected on them and after the entry of CMO 65. This leaves the Plaintiffs whose individual submissions assert the AZ Defendants filed a notice of appearance after service, which, they argue, waived the AZ Defendants’ untimely service defense because those notices incorporated the long form answer without further raising such a defense. However, as discussed above, at that point, the AZ Defendants had specifically “reserve[d] all rights to move to dismiss … under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule[] 12” when they (and Plaintiffs) agreed to CMO No. 7. CMO No. 7 at § G. Accordingly, the Cоurt concludes that by filing a notice of appearance in a case in which the AZ Defendants had plainly reserved their right to challenge service, that notice of appearance did not negate the prior reservation and thereby waive the defense.7

Plaintiffs’ final argument on waiver is that the AZ Defendants waived their defense of service through their conduct in the PPI litigation either as a whole or in individual cases. In support of their argument as to the AZ Defendants’ conduct in the litigation as a whole, Plaintiffs rely on In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, No. 07-5944, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 78902 (N.D. Cal. June 9, 2014). In that case, certain defendants raised their Rule 12(b)(5) defense to service in a consolidated motion ‍​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍to dismiss, but subsequently abandoned that 12(b)(5) motion in a later filing and then continued to participate in litigation for four years. The court found that under these circumstances those defendants had waived their defense of lack of service. Id. at *84-88.

The case is inapposite, however, as the AZ Defendants never previously raised—and subsequently abandoned—the defense of service in any of the cases identified here, and indeed was unable to without leave of the Court under CMO No. 7, as agreed to by the parties. Similarly, Plaintiffs’ reliance on In re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (“MTBE“) Prods. Liab. Litig., 162 F. Supp. 3d 247 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2016), is misplaced. There, the plaintiff‘s timely but defective service on the defendant‘s prior (and thus incorrect) address combined with the defendant‘s actions in participating in the litigation (including attending MDL status conferences in which the particular case was discussed and waiting until after the stаtute of limitations had expired before moving to dismiss the complaint for lack of service) contributed to the plaintiff being “lulled into believing it had effectively served” the defendant. Id. at 250. The court thus found that the defendant‘s conduct justified the court‘s exercising its discretion to extend the time for service, but, importantly, the court did not find that the defendant had waived its defense. Id. at 48-50. Plaintiffs here have not asserted that they timely served the AZ Defendants at the wrong address or were otherwise lulled into thinking that they had in fact properly served the AZ Defendants before CMO No. 65 was entered. Therefore, neither In re CRT nor In re MTBE justifies Plaintiffs’ argument.

Additionally, Plaintiffs’ general response argues that the AZ Defendants waived their defense of service by participating in the litigation of individuаl cases, citing In re: Ethicon, Inc., No. 2:13-cv-00758, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148765 (S.D.W.V. Oct. 27, 2016). But there, the defendants acknowledged receipt of a plaintiff profile form, requested additional information from the plaintiffs regarding their claims, and threatened to pursue a remedy in court if the plaintiff did not comply with their request. Id. at *6. By contrast, none of the Plaintiffs in the 1,181 cases herein claim that they received a deficiency letter related to their Plaintiff Fact Sheet, or that the AZ

Defendants threatened to pursue a judicial remedy if the plaintiff did not cure the deficiency. In short, unlike in the Ethicon case, none of these Plaintiffs has demonstrated that the AZ Defendants have meaningfully participated in the litigation in their particular case. Further, the Court rejects Plaintiffs’ suggestion to impute the AZ Defendants’ conduct in defending themselves in cases not subject to CMO No. 65 to suggest that the AZ Defendants waived their defense of service of process in the specific cases identified in Exhibit A hereto.

Plaintiffs also assert that the AZ Defendants have waited too long to assert their defense of service. Plaintiffs rely on the Sixth Circuit‘s decision in King v. Taylor; however, in that case, unlike here, the defendant actively litigated the case by, among other things, filing a joint Rule 26(f) report, participating in depositions, seeking to extend discovery deadlines, and joining in a status report in that particular case, and only moved to dismiss for lack of service at the summary judgment stage. King v. Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 659-61 (6th Cir. 2012). Here, however, none of the 1,181 cases identified in Exhibit A is a Bellwethеr case or a Wave case and thus the AZ Defendants have not participated in discovery in the individual cases like the defendant in Taylor did. Further, as noted previously, stipulated CMO No. 7 precluded the AZ Defendants from filing a motion to dismiss for lack of service without leave of the Court.

IV. Conclusion

CMO No. 65 required Plaintiffs to (1) show they timely served the AZ Defendants pursuant to Rule 4(m), (2) dismiss the AZ Defendants from their case, or (3) show cause why this Court should not dismiss the AZ Defendants from their cases. Plaintiffs whose cases are on Exhibit A have failed to meet their burden of demonstrating good cause for failure to comply with CMO No. 65 and effectuate timely service, and have failed to persuade the Court to exercise its discretion not to dismiss the AZ Defendants from their cases. Accordingly, this Court denies Plaintiffs’

requests for extensions and orders the AZ Defendants to be dismissed without prejudice from the cases identified in Exhibit A.8

Accordingly, IT IS on this 24 day of April, 2023;

ORDERED that the AZ Defendants shall be DISMISSED without prejudice from the cases identified in Exhibit A hereto.

SO ORDERED.

CLAIRE C. CECCHI, U.S.D.J.

Exhibit A

Plaintiff NameCase No.
1Ronald Trent2:18-cv-03769
2Sunny Nielson2:18-cv-03770
3Valerie D. Bell2:18-cv-03774
4Antonio D. Davis2:18-cv-03775
5Misty Ashley2:18-cv-03851
6Carolyn Ellis2:18-cv-03855
7Fred Foscalina, As Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Betty Foscalina, Deceased2:18-cv-03856
8Ronald Gardea2:18-cv-03858
9Paul Gann and Candance Gann2:18-cv-03878
10Alva Stewart2:18-cv-03879
11Shawney Tackett, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of David L. Francis, Deceased2:18-cv-03880
12Nancy M. Crockett2:18-cv-03883
13Lynda D. McKibben2:18-cv-03885
14Leonore L. Sosa2:18-cv-03886
15Nathaniel McDaniel2:18-cv-03888
16Susan Cobb2:18-cv-03889
17Mary E. Berry2:18-cv-03898
18Kerrie Griffin2:18-cv-04021
19Charlene Coffey2:18-cv-04024
20Janet Gills2:18-cv-04028
21Debra Grigsby2:18-cv-04031
22Barbara Gibson2:18-cv-04033
23Steven Knox2:18-cv-04036
24Iva Good2:18-cv-04038
25Larry Rutheford and Diane E. Rutheford2:18-cv-04039
26Cynthia Gordon2:18-cv-04042
27Doris Cook2:18-cv-04043
28Alvin Cooper, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Peggy Cooper, Deceased2:18-cv-04045
29Ricky L. Graham2:18-cv-04047
30Norman Kydd2:18-cv-04048
31Jeanette Gillespie2:18-cv-04049
32Joyce Gettys2:18-cv-04052
33Joyce Covington2:18-cv-04053
34Della I. Gregg2:18-cv-04054
35Theresa Landingham2:18-cv-04057
36Connie L. Croy2:18-cv-04058
37Christopher Cracolice and Martha Ann Cracolice2:18-cv-04064
38Terrisina Lawrence-Mason2:18-cv-04065
39Dianne Webber2:18-cv-04069
40Deborah Kirby and Thomas Kirby2:18-cv-04073
41Gaye Riggle, As Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Thomas Riggle, Deceased2:18-cv-04076
42Ethelyn Ruddell2:18-cv-04077

Exhibit A

43Denver Kennett and Delores Kennett2:18-cv-04078
44Nancy Ritterbush2:18-cv-04084
45Karen Reese2:18-cv-04086
46Willa Roberts2:18-cv-04087
47Tyrone Robinson2:18-cv-04088
48John Van Ness2:18-cv-04090
49Harry Hortsch2:18-cv-04093
50John Ortiz2:18-cv-04095
51Mike Moffat2:18-cv-04139
52Kristine S. Murff2:18-cv-04145
53Jeff Vider and Peggy Vider2:18-cv-04151
54Laurie T. Lum2:18-cv-04159
55Patrick Kirk and Rena Kirk2:18-cv-04163
56Barbara Corley2:18-cv-04164
57Danny Kinser2:18-cv-04167
58Betty L. Sanner2:18-cv-04169
59Valerie Taylor2:18-cv-04173
60Charles Ketcherside2:18-cv-04178
61Tia Hartmann2:18-cv-04180
62Grady Harris2:18-cv-04181
63Sue Ann Sanford2:18-cv-04182
64Daniel Sharp2:18-cv-04184
65Kathleen Johnson2:18-cv-04190
66Rachel Hogg2:18-cv-04192
67Barry Turner2:18-cv-04193
68Janice Givins2:18-cv-04197
69Gilda Saunders2:18-cv-04198
70Isaac S. Reid2:18-cv-04200
71Froncell Shannon2:18-cv-04207
72Mary A. Williams2:18-cv-04208
73Stephanie James and Bernard James2:18-cv-04209
74Rayshell Robinson2:18-cv-04215
75William Gilmore2:18-cv-04216
76Lorraine Smith2:18-cv-04217
77Deborah Harling2:18-cv-04218
78Samantha Hawksorth, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of David L. Hawksworth, Deceased2:18-cv-04220
79Richard Hobbs2:18-cv-04222
80Michael Arnold2:18-cv-04454
81Linda Atkinson and Tommy Atkinson2:18-cv-04459
82Larry Brewer, Sr.2:18-cv-04461
83Sylvia Brooks2:18-cv-04462
84Herbert Banks and Myra Banks2:18-cv-04463
85Willien Holmes2:18-cv-04464
86Geneva Corbitt2:18-cv-04465
87Jerry Cameron2:18-cv-04467
88Kimberly A. Clark2:18-cv-04469

Exhibit A

89Edna Fitzsimmons2:18-cv-04472
90Jerry Campbell2:18-cv-04473
91Wendy Bess2:18-cv-04474
92Thelma Hampton2:18-cv-04476
93Donald Coble2:18-cv-04478
94Norman Holloway2:18-cv-04481
95Rozell Collins2:18-cv-04482
96Cassandra Howard2:18-cv-04484
97Kent Davis2:18-cv-04486
98Kathy Cook2:18-cv-04487
99Douglas Ivey2:18-cv-04488
100Sharren Crowell2:18-cv-04489
101Michael Lopez2:18-cv-04494
102Sandra Davis2:18-cv-04496
103Robert Parham, Jr.2:18-cv-04497
104Junior McDaniel2:18-cv-04498
105Climmie Gibbons2:18-cv-04499
106Terеsa Harlen, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Jack R. Harlen, Deceased2:18-cv-04500
107Herschel Merriett2:18-cv-04503
108Virginia Rackins2:18-cv-04504
109Otis Roberts2:18-cv-04507
110Henry Hess, Sr.2:18-cv-04509
111Charles Graham2:18-cv-04510
112Gail Semler2:18-cv-04513
113Laquanda Riggins2:18-cv-04514
114Patricia Simmons2:18-cv-04515
115Antonia Simmons2:18-cv-04517
116Jessie Martin2:18-cv-04519
117Mary Hankamer and Ed Hankamer2:18-cv-04520
118Christina Shubrick2:18-cv-04521
119Michael Morelock2:18-cv-04522
120Corliss Royal2:18-cv-04523
121Yvonne Sheers2:18-cv-04524
122Adeana Hardin2:18-cv-04525
123Brenda Dale2:18-cv-04526
124Brenda Smith-Capps2:18-cv-04527
125Kelly Smith2:18-cv-04529
126Frances Hardins2:18-cv-04530
127Ronald White2:18-cv-04531
128Delma Comer2:18-cv-04532
129Barbara Sapp-Greene2:18-cv-04533
130Mary Haynes2:18-cv-04535
131Sandra Young2:18-cv-04536
132Paul E. Wheeler2:18-cv-04537
133Betty Head2:18-cv-04538
134Kathy Shegda2:18-cv-04542

Exhibit A

135Kathleen Hughes2:18-cv-04543
136Terria Wallace-Terrell2:18-cv-04544
137Philip Sawyer2:18-cv-04545
138Gary Nunez2:18-cv-04614
139Rhea Smith2:18-cv-04615
140Dwayne Fails2:18-cv-04618
141Daniel Opp2:18-cv-04622
142Tina Bowman2:18-cv-04623
143Ted Smith2:18-cv-04624
144Betty Brumfield2:18-cv-04626
145Walter Hammond and Adah Kennon2:18-cv-04628
146Alvin Stafford2:18-cv-04629
147Edward Chicarelli, Sr.2:18-cv-04631
148Gregory Chicarelli2:18-cv-04635
149Valerie Jones2:18-cv-04636
150John Sydnor2:18-cv-04637
151Jacqueline Blake2:18-cv-04638
152Jason Kellems2:18-cv-04639
153Barbara Johnson2:18-cv-04640
154William E. Taulbee2:18-cv-04646
155James Thornhill2:18-cv-04651
156Keith Likes2:18-cv-04652
157Mark Pickens2:18-cv-04657
158Peggy Waldron2:18-cv-04658
159Dawn Lockett2:18-cv-04659
160Carolyn Polly2:18-cv-04660
161Jerry Queen2:18-cv-04661
162Bobbie Walker2:18-cv-04663
163Eugenia Long2:18-cv-04664
164Joaquin Ramos and Linda Ramos2:18-cv-04665
165Margaret Manly2:18-cv-04667
166Janie Washington2:18-cv-04669
167Dena Sinnett2:18-cv-04671
168Brian Boyd2:18-cv-04672
169Rachedia Ross, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Kelli Prevo, Deceased2:18-cv-04681
170Thelma Mason2:18-cv-04684
171Brenda Read2:18-cv-04687
172Julie Redderson2:18-cv-04690
173Harvey Chavez2:18-cv-04695
174Patricia J Smith2:18-cv-04696
175Judith Turner2:18-cv-04697
176Irma Santana2:18-cv-04698
177Michael Chivers2:18-cv-04699
178Sharon Turner2:18-cv-04700
179Paula Saul2:18-cv-04703
180Paula Sue Schilling2:18-cv-04706

Exhibit A

181Milton Sidwell2:18-cv-04708
182Wilma Wilson2:18-cv-04710
183Amoikon Ngouan2:18-cv-05032
184Roger Phillips and Margaret Phillips2:18-cv-05034
185Erika Short2:18-cv-05035
186Joseph Stephenson2:18-cv-05036
187Linda Swinford-Cooksey2:18-cv-05037
188Elizabeth Talton2:18-cv-05039
189Wanda Thomas2:18-cv-05040
190Guy Thomas2:18-cv-05043
191Sharon Thornhill2:18-cv-05044
192Isaiah Thomas2:18-cv-05045
193Patricia Vineyard2:18-cv-05046
194Donna Wicker2:18-cv-05048
195Michael Yardrough2:18-cv-05050
196Perry Trowbridge2:18-cv-05051
197Kathy Baumgartner2:18-cv-05052
198Keith Turner2:18-cv-05053
199Betty Dodd2:18-cv-05054
200Lorenzo Valenzuela2:18-cv-05055
201Maria Valenzuela2:18-cv-05057
202Patrika Vestal2:18-cv-05059
203Crystal Cartier2:18-cv-05063
204Jerry Messer2:18-cv-05067
205John Muncy2:18-cv-05071
206Linda Williams2:18-cv-05075
207Patricia Younger2:18-cv-05078
208Michael Worthen2:18-cv-05079
209Robert Dryden2:18-cv-05081
210Ricky Thomas2:18-cv-05082
211Christina Ward2:18-cv-05083
212Charla Mogg2:18-cv-05084
213Tommy Huff, Sr.2:18-cv-05086
214Renee Martinez2:18-cv-05128
215Ramon Barrios2:18-cv-05129
216Stephen Mitchell2:18-cv-05130
217Allen Murrow2:18-cv-05132
218Jerry Franklin2:18-cv-05133
219Myra McAllister2:18-cv-05134
220Marilyn McCallister2:18-cv-05136
221Anthony Taormina2:18-cv-05137
222Charles Smith2:18-cv-05138
223Donnie Mink2:18-cv-05140
224Melody Nequette2:18-cv-05141
225Darlene Farr2:18-cv-05143
226Catherine Morton-Davis2:18-cv-05144
227Bonnie Goodchild2:18-cv-05146

Exhibit A

228Dana Butler2:18-cv-05148
229Phillip Harris and Denise Harris2:18-cv-05150
230Hermon McNac, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Lillie M. Butler, Deceased2:18-cv-05152
231Glenda Mays2:18-cv-05153
232Kathryn Caban2:18-cv-05155
233Christine Scott2:18-cv-05158
234Crystal Henson2:18-cv-05160
235David McMillen2:18-cv-05161
236Clara Singleton2:18-cv-05162
237Timothy Carter2:18-cv-05163
238Barbara Lambert and Paul Lambert2:18-cv-05164
239Phillip Tavegia2:18-cv-05165
240Sarah Mitchell2:18-cv-05166
241Charlotte Means2:18-cv-05167
242Richard Moran2:18-cv-05170
243Frederick Nickerson2:18-cv-05171
244Diane Murphy2:18-cv-05174
245Glenn Nemecek2:18-cv-05177
246Margorie Walker2:18-cv-05178
247Ruth Williamson2:18-cv-05179
248Harold E. Rakestraw2:18-cv-05183
249Linda Smith2:18-cv-05186
250Caroline Weatherton2:18-cv-05189
251Janie Wright2:18-cv-05190
252Marisha Miller2:18-cv-05191
253Melinda McMillen and Lawrence R. McMillen2:18-cv-05194
254Louanna Dunlap2:18-cv-05195
255Nancy Miller2:18-cv-05197
256George Hansen2:18-cv-05198
257Dwight Smith2:18-cv-05202
258Freddie Johnson2:18-cv-05205
259Rebecca Johnston2:18-cv-05206
260Alfred Vargas2:18-cv-05207
261Deanna Lacy2:18-cv-05208
262Terry Rasmussen2:18-cv-05209
263Barbara Manuel2:18-cv-05212
264Norma Williams2:18-cv-05213
265Teresa Byers2:18-cv-05431
266Adrian Nagy2:18-cv-05432
267Anthony Richardson2:18-cv-05434
268Rosemary Lehr2:18-cv-05437
269Donald Gibson2:18-cv-05438
270Lindell Shelby2:18-cv-05439
271Susan Miller2:18-cv-05441
272William Wade2:18-cv-05449
273Larry Huffman2:18-cv-05451

Exhibit A

274William Wegis2:18-cv-05453
275Darrell Craw2:18-cv-05454
276Gerald Whatley2:18-cv-05455
277Joseph Cervantes2:18-cv-05456
278Sherry Hunt2:18-cv-05457
279Kit Middleton2:18-cv-05461
280Sandra Garrett2:18-cv-05463
281Hilda Johnson2:18-cv-05464
282Tony Hernandez2:18-cv-05472
283Bryan Swanson2:18-cv-05476
284Pamela Clark2:18-cv-05478
285Melvin Stubbs2:18-cv-05479
286Brett Timothy2:18-cv-05481
287Linda M. Williams2:18-cv-05482
288Cecelia Clipper2:18-cv-05483
289Jennifer Wolfe2:18-cv-05485
290Catherine Farrell2:18-cv-05487
291Sharon Powers2:18-cv-05488
292Arthur Warshawsky2:18-cv-05490
293Martha Burns2:18-cv-05495
294Gary Robertson2:18-cv-05499
295Kyle Rose2:18-cv-05500
296Margie Jennings2:18-cv-05501
297Rickey Crihfield, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Miki L. Crihfield, deceased2:18-cv-05502
298Jeffrey Jones2:18-cv-05504
299Deborah Lee2:18-cv-05507
300Ellen Moritt2:18-cv-05509
301Burma Sizemore2:18-cv-05511
302Bob Hoover2:18-cv-05513
303Carmen Stevens2:18-cv-05516
304Samantha Lawson2:18-cv-05520
305Shirley Teel, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Ezra C. Teel, Deceased2:18-cv-05521
306Margie Delauder2:18-cv-05526
307Brenda Bunch2:18-cv-05942
308Richard Cannon2:18-cv-05947
309Melissa Curry2:18-cv-05952
310Brenda Dye2:18-cv-05956
311Sheryl Gerald2:18-cv-05959
312Cedric Florence2:18-cv-05960
313Dennis Lane2:18-cv-05962
314Marsha Layman2:18-cv-05964
315Joyce Noble2:18-cv-05968
316Samantha Riddle2:18-cv-05971
317Richard Slate2:18-cv-05973
318Gwenda Steele2:18-cv-05975

Exhibit A

319Barbara Gibson, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Alta Gibson, Deceased2:18-cv-05976
320William Taylor2:18-cv-05977
321Janet Washington2:18-cv-05978
322George Hawkins2:18-cv-05980
323Dana Wilson2:18-cv-05982
324Michael Longacre2:18-cv-05988
325Linda Martin2:18-cv-05989
326Debra O‘Neal2:18-cv-05993
327Elnora Pope2:18-cv-05995
328Susan Reedy2:18-cv-05996
329Debbie Reynolds2:18-cv-05997
330Lacy Skinner2:18-cv-06000
331Linda Wilson2:18-cv-06002
332Brenda Young2:18-cv-06003
333Kathryn Anderson2:18-cv-06134
334Larry Basham and Linda Basham2:18-cv-06138
335Mary Hollander2:18-cv-06148
336Lance Faulkner2:18-cv-06154
337Christina Ford2:18-cv-06157
338Ruby Brake2:18-cv-06161
339Sharon Reid2:18-cv-06164
340Jimmy Brown2:18-cv-06165
341Bartholomew Gaiera and Karen Gaiera2:18-cv-06166
342Gregry Russell2:18-cv-06169
343Kathlene Brown2:18-cv-06171
344Sarah Brown2:18-cv-06175
345Sonjia Short2:18-cv-06177
346Donald Silas2:18-cv-06180
347Rita Bentley2:18-cv-06184
348Rebecca Harrington2:18-cv-06196
349Linda Buie2:18-cv-06198
350Patricia Hasty2:18-cv-06202
351John Copp2:18-cv-06204
352Sherry Davis2:18-cv-06206
353Garry Jackson2:18-cv-06207
354Richard Jackson and Judy Fontenot2:18-cv-06214
355John Whatley2:18-cv-06216
356Eugene Johnson2:18-cv-06222
357Beverly Elgan2:18-cv-06223
358Susan Downs2:18-cv-06224
359Cardell Woodard2:18-cv-06225
360Sharon Farris2:18-cv-06227
361Junita Horn2:18-cv-06231
362Bonnie Mize2:18-cv-06232
363Jackie Knight2:18-cv-06233
364Sarah Landry2:18-cv-06239

Exhibit A

365Richard Guiterrez2:18-cv-06240
366Richard Leonard2:18-cv-06244
367Karla Lee2:18-cv-06245
368Theodore Logan, Jr.2:18-cv-06250
369Sonja Prince2:18-cv-06251
370Belinda Holland2:18-cv-06253
371Tunya Lowe2:18-cv-06256
372Steve Thompson2:18-cv-06260
373Dorothy Van Horn2:18-cv-06264
374Sandra Walling2:18-cv-06268
375Marlene McIntyre2:18-cv-06270
376Michael Wetselline2:18-cv-06271
377Patina Johnson2:18-cv-06274
378Billy Largen and Donna Brown2:18-cv-06278
379Lillian Paxton2:18-cv-06284
380Bob Russom2:18-cv-06288
381Susan White, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Eugene Kujawski, Deceased2:18-cv-06432
382Johnny Daniels2:18-cv-06440
383Emilee Palmer and Michael D. Palmer2:18-cv-06449
384Mary Nordby, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Joan Jackson, Deceased2:18-cv-06450
385Tina Thornburg2:18-cv-06456
386Ennis Dunning2:18-cv-06460
387Marsha Graham, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Gary Graham, Deceased2:18-cv-06467
388Kevin Harper2:18-cv-06473
389Travis Charlton, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cynthia Halbert, Deceased2:18-cv-06476
390Ima Young and Hollis Young-Wheely2:18-cv-06480
391Lesa Honn, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Leonard Honn, Deceased2:18-cv-06481
392Teresa Alvarez, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Thomas Alvarez, Deceased2:18-cv-06484
393Rosie Alvarez, Individually and as Proposed Representative ‍​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍of the Estate of Urbano Alvarez, Deceased2:18-cv-06488
394Nina Fernandez, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Sanra Nobil, Deceased2:18-cv-06497
395Bradley Olson and Shirley Olson2:18-cv-06498
396Bernice Haley, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Dennis Ray Haley, Deceased2:18-cv-06504
397Jerry Blosser, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Wanda Blosser, Deceased2:18-cv-06515
398Norma Stillwagoner2:18-cv-06520
399Debbie Edgell, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Jackie Edgell, Deceased2:18-cv-06521

Exhibit A

400Karen Keenan, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Larry Keenan, Deceased2:18-cv-06522
401Shirley Morton, Individually and as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Delbert P Morton Sr., Deceased2:18-cv-06527
402James McDade, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Laverne McDade, Deceased2:18-cv-06528
403Gina Zerby, Individually and as the Proposed Representative of Michael Zerby, Deceased2:18-cv-06532
404Lillian Paxton, Individually and as Proposed Representatie of the Estate of John Paxton, Deceased2:18-cv-06533
405Michelle Wilson2:18-cv-06540
406Rita Johnson, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Lessie Tharpe, Deceased2:18-cv-06549
407Emily Knotts, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cheryl Stefenel, Deceased2:18-cv-06552
408William Cavanaugh and Margaret Cavanaugh2:18-cv-06791
409Julie Cross2:18-cv-06800
410Jacquelyn Booker2:18-cv-06834
411Dianne Caldwell2:18-cv-06846
412Brenda Cameron2:18-cv-06854
413Leona Collins, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Deniese Collins, Deceased2:18-cv-06869
414Patrick Connors2:18-cv-06876
415Larry Ludwick2:18-cv-06937
416Gladys Maddox2:18-cv-06939
417Frank Rendon2:18-cv-06940
418Johnnie Oliver2:18-cv-06947
419Charles Jones, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Victoria Jones, Deceased2:18-cv-06952
420John Cole2:18-cv-06962
421Helen Robinson2:18-cv-06963
422Dorothy Alegria, As the Representative of the Estate of Edwin Alegria, deceased2:18-cv-06966
423Charles Howard2:18-cv-06986
424Luvern Purnell2:18-cv-06997
425Amy Qualles2:18-cv-07001
426Teresa Hill-Ibrahim2:18-cv-07005
427Barbara Burger2:18-cv-07027
428Kathy Lockhart2:18-cv-07032
429Dionna McGairk2:18-cv-07043
430Vertis Kellam2:18-cv-07048
431Judy Bradshaw, Individually and as the Rеpresentative of the Estate of Jimmy Bradshaw, Deceased2:18-cv-07049
432Richard Oyerbides, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Rebecca Mobley, Deceased2:18-cv-07052
433Shane Kilgore2:18-cv-07057
434Judy Wolford2:18-cv-07079

Exhibit A

435Aquinda Woodrum2:18-cv-07084
436Virginia Boyd2:18-cv-07090
437Carl Evans Jr. and Carolyn Evans2:18-cv-07106
438Herman Firmin2:18-cv-07110
439Cornelius Bentley Sr.2:18-cv-07112
440Herbert Johnson2:18-cv-07130
441Joan Stoveken, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Gay Stoveken, Deceased2:18-cv-07137
442Angela Spicer, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of James Spicer, Deceased2:18-cv-07148
443Amanda Turner, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Ronald Turner, Deceased2:18-cv-07153
444Christopher Crittenden2:18-cv-07154
445Jessie Darby, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Donnie Darby, Deceased2:18-cv-07156
446Malissa Wilson2:18-cv-07170
447Erick Barnes2:18-cv-07187
448John Norton2:18-cv-07192
449Tammy Perry2:18-cv-07194
450Brenda Fletcher2:18-cv-07203
451Nancy Esque2:18-cv-07208
452Kathleen King2:18-cv-07228
453Robert Brown2:18-cv-07234
454Diane McGee, individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Kevin McGee, Deceased2:18-cv-07239
455Mary Laffoon2:18-cv-07243
456George Gale2:18-cv-07267
457Clarence Abrams2:18-cv-07270
458Bonnie Apple2:18-cv-07287
459Helen Cannon2:18-cv-07302
460Sharon Ayers-Johnson2:18-cv-07313
461Olivia Hogan, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Maggie Harrison, Deceased2:18-cv-07319
462Brenda Bell2:18-cv-07333
463Thomas Russo2:18-cv-07340
464Forest Moore2:18-cv-07351
465Paul Lue, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Hyacinth Johnson, Deceased2:18-cv-07352
466Ernestine Mays-Mitchell, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Ernest Mays, Deceased2:18-cv-07365
467Clarence Rich2:18-cv-07373
468Cynthia Stapleton2:18-cv-07381
469Alice Williams2:18-cv-07390
470Birdie Woods2:18-cv-07438
471Lynette Tucker2:18-cv-07441
472Mary Murphy, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Garland Murphy, Deceased2:18-cv-07450

Exhibit A

473Ronald Chasteen2:18-cv-07474
474Douglas Dennison2:18-cv-07488
475Kathleen White2:18-cv-07501
476Shirley Newsome2:18-cv-07503
477Lloyd Fleenor2:18-cv-07515
478Jamie Morgan, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Bernard Morgan, Deceased2:18-cv-07526
479Cecelia Roberts2:18-cv-07534
480Tammy Taylor2:18-cv-07538
481Bessie Madden2:18-cv-07541
482Frank Tropier, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Irene Tropier, Deceased2:18-cv-07544
483Deborah King, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Eva Manley, Deceased2:18-cv-07550
484Curtis Blankenship2:18-cv-07553
485Betty Apellido2:18-cv-07557
486Ora Groves2:18-cv-07590
487Gloria Dietrich2:18-cv-07592
488Robin Eden2:18-cv-07613
489Walker Howell2:18-cv-07616
490Stephanie Ralston-Bailey2:18-cv-07617
491Laura Richie2:18-cv-07622
492Regina Salisbury2:18-cv-07632
493Marlene Hatfield2:18-cv-07639
494Caren Singer2:18-cv-07640
495Randall Morton2:18-cv-07662
496Sharon Nali2:18-cv-07667
497Irvin Albright2:18-cv-07669
498Mary Ann Negrete, individually and as the Represеntative of the Estate of Hiram Negrete, Deceased2:18-cv-07671
499William Solis, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Aura Burgos, Deceased2:18-cv-07688
500Ronald Klinenberg2:18-cv-07706
501Linda Weller, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Marjorie Beecher, Deceased2:18-cv-07707
502Luis Nesta2:18-cv-07708
503Lorraine Turco2:18-cv-07713
504Delorise Marks2:18-cv-07716
505Mildred Hernandez, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Charles Varela, Deceased2:18-cv-07724
506Hazel Phillips2:18-cv-07748
507Elvia Quiroga, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Pedro Quiroga, Deceased2:18-cv-07751
508Tracie Powers2:18-cv-07756
509Mary Rivali, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Robert Rivali, Deceased2:18-cv-07760
510Roger Nelson2:18-cv-07773

Exhibit A

511Marilyn Sullivan, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Evelyn Sullivan, Deceased2:18-cv-07781
512Bernadine Hardie2:18-cv-07795
513Peter Guerrero2:18-cv-07796
514Delisha Thomas2:18-cv-07801
515Joel Neidlinger2:18-cv-07833
516Deanna Shafer2:18-cv-07851
517Michael Barnett2:19-cv-01055
518Susan Hageman, As Proposed Representative of the Estate оf Jack Hageman, Deceased2:19-cv-01584
519Dennis Kendall2:19-cv-01668
520Quintin Dennis2:19-cv-01813
521Ruth Dobson2:19-cv-01849
522Martha Griffith2:19-cv-01853
523William Hall2:19-cv-01859
524Gloria Haywood2:19-cv-01881
525James Amato2:19-cv-01883
526Ruth Hurd2:19-cv-01887
527Eric Hurwitz2:19-cv-01889
528Patricia Joppien2:19-cv-01897
529Paul Jozwiak2:19-cv-01902
530Ethel Birch2:19-cv-01914
531Michele Blomont2:19-cv-01923
532George Bonis2:19-cv-01931
533Raymond Bryant2:19-cv-01939
534John Bottoms2:19-cv-01945
535Cindy Campbell2:19-cv-01948
536Colleen Cantwell2:19-cv-01965
537Janis Carlton, Individually and as the Representative fo the Estate of Arland Carlton Jr., Deceased2:19-cv-01976
538Gladys Carpenter2:19-cv-01981
539Pete Caudillo2:19-cv-01990
540Brandon Cole2:19-cv-02004
541Robert Crenshaw2:19-cv-02011
542Wanda Crager2:19-cv-02012
543Jason Daniels2:19-cv-02015
544Linda McMillen2:19-cv-02035
545Odessa Mitchell2:19-cv-02040
546Patricia Mitchell2:19-cv-02048
547Charles Newsom2:19-cv-02050
548Orestes Diaz2:19-cv-02059
549Helmut Otto2:19-cv-02061
550Charlotte Edgar2:19-cv-02074
551Carey Bowie, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Henry Bowie, Deceased2:19-cv-02086
552William Elias2:19-cv-02089
553Warren Ketchmore2:19-cv-02102

Exhibit A

554Juan Cantu, Individually and as the Representative ‍​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍of the Estate of Margarita Cantu, Deceased2:19-cv-02104
555Juanita Landers2:19-cv-02127
556Johnny Fritts2:19-cv-02128
557Karen Gaines2:19-cv-02136
558Brenda McCurdy, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Rickey McCurdy, Deceased2:19-cv-02143
559Gloria Hernandez2:19-cv-02147
560Cynthia McDonald, As the representative of the Estate of Helen McDonald, deceased2:19-cv-02157
561Bridgette Long2:19-cv-02159
562Nettie Overton, individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Charlie Overton, Deceased2:19-cv-02174
563Glenda Long2:19-cv-02175
564Melissa Olson2:19-cv-02204
565Sandra Pannell2:19-cv-02246
566Priscille Parent2:19-cv-02261
567Lucretia Peavy2:19-cv-02275
568Mabel Perry2:19-cv-02318
569Glenna Pool2:19-cv-02335
570Debra Primrose2:19-cv-02356
571Margaret Pryor, As the Representative of the Estate of Keith Pryor, deceased2:19-cv-02367
572Joyce Sheffield2:19-cv-02377
573Terry Sheffield2:19-cv-02386
574Esther Rangel, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Armando Rangel, Deceased2:19-cv-02404
575Henry Shuster2:19-cv-02445
576John Silva2:19-cv-02454
577Lionel Smith2:19-cv-02464
578Linda Stockwell2:19-cv-02475
579Diane Watkins2:19-cv-02484
580James Williams2:19-cv-02487
581Charles Wiley2:19-cv-02493
582Darwin Valentine2:19-cv-02547
583Linda Wood2:19-cv-02562
584Susan Lynn Wright, Individually and as the Representatie of the Estate of Tabitha Wright, Deceased2:19-cv-02577
585Denise Brown2:19-cv-02581
586Donna Wooten2:19-cv-02586
587Andra Henderson2:19-cv-02743
588Darryl Herod2:19-cv-02748
589Michael Prilla2:19-cv-02955
590John Choyce2:19-cv-02988
591Cheryl Adams, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Belle Collins, Deceased2:19-cv-02996
592Elia Carrillo2:19-cv-03068

Exhibit A

593Jeffrey Carter, Sr.2:19-cv-03069
594Carla Comer2:19-cv-03073
595Leota Conrad2:19-cv-03075
596John Covell2:19-cv-03078
597Cynthia Etheridge2:19-cv-03118
598Nancy Fennell2:19-cv-03132
599Nellie Ferguson2:19-cv-03137
600Treva Graves2:19-cv-03142
601Terry Haynes2:19-cv-03163
602Bertha Gable2:19-cv-03165
603Georgia Jackson-Wade2:19-cv-03193
604Rhonda Gomez2:19-cv-03217
605Kevin Goss2:19-cv-03252
606Paula Jones2:19-cv-03256
607Merle Kirkland2:19-cv-03272
608Mark Lacombe2:19-cv-03277
609Dennis Lacy2:19-cv-03284
610Lisa Peters2:19-cv-03312
611Shelia Holmes2:19-cv-03327
612Edward Miller2:19-cv-03340
613Brandon Hugghins2:19-cv-03366
614Sylvia Perez2:19-cv-03368
615Linda Phillips2:19-cv-03376
616Michelle Inman2:19-cv-03391
617Charlene Jackson2:19-cv-03415
618Brenda Ridyolph2:19-cv-03419
619Paula Jackson2:19-cv-03433
620Sandi Robinson2:19-cv-03435
621Wanda Rogers2:19-cv-03445
622Barbara Steele2:19-cv-03458
623Bettye Stockton2:19-cv-03467
624Erick Joe2:19-cv-03476
625Nancy Sullivan2:19-cv-03477
626Shirley Swope2:19-cv-03480
627Cynthia Tucker2:19-cv-03489
628Shirlie Johnson2:19-cv-03494
629Dante Wilder2:19-cv-03508
630Moses Willmore2:19-cv-03520
631Lidia Yanez2:19-cv-03524
632Ronald E. Ker2:19-cv-03528
633Karen Collins, As proposed representative of the Estate of Charles Collins, deceased2:19-cv-03537
634Carolyn Coule and Jerome Coule2:19-cv-03544
635Joel Kight2:19-cv-03545
636Rosetta Cunningham2:19-cv-03553
637Helen Davis2:19-cv-03561
638Paul E. Dilocker2:19-cv-03589

Exhibit A

639Ruth Edwards2:19-cv-03595
640Rickie Swonger, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Joyce Boyer, Deceased2:19-cv-03596
641Carl Brewer, Jr.2:19-cv-03605
642Lowanda Ford, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of William Ford, Deceased2:19-cv-03612
643Phillip Cottle2:19-cv-03618
644Linda Fresquez2:19-cv-03624
645Timothy Buzard2:19-cv-03626
646Diana Greathouse2:19-cv-03633
647Lena Turknett, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cecilia Gaines, Deceased2:19-cv-03636
648Suzanne Coleman-Cunningham2:19-cv-03638
649Maria Garcia2:19-cv-03644
650Betty Hunter, Individually and as the Rеpresentative of the Estate of Thomas Hunter, Deceased2:19-cv-03645
651Noreen Davis-Xanthis2:19-cv-03646
652Harrison Gift, III2:19-cv-03651
653Juanita Mekwuye2:19-cv-03652
654Lucille Dunson2:19-cv-03661
655Bernadette Green2:19-cv-03662
656Barbara Zajack2:19-cv-03663
657Ruthie Griffin2:19-cv-03670
658Melba Fabel2:19-cv-03671
659Jennifer Collins2:19-cv-03679
660Cecile Fichtner2:19-cv-03681
661Melissa Harris2:19-cv-03684
662Tracy Henderson2:19-cv-03685
663Linwood Flemister2:19-cv-03686
664Kathlene Henson and Ernest Henson2:19-cv-03687
665Elizabeth Flournoy2:19-cv-03697
666Cathleen James2:19-cv-03707
667James Franklin, Sr.2:19-cv-03711
668Cyndi Mazza, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Josephine Kempf, Deceased2:19-cv-03716
669Cynthia Lawhorn2:19-cv-03739
670Adeline Henderson2:19-cv-03769
671Linda Martinez2:19-cv-03777
672Lynell Johnson2:19-cv-03784
673Michael Jones2:19-cv-03806
674Cara Kreider2:19-cv-03817
675Stephen McNeill2:19-cv-03823
676Richard Lombardo2:19-cv-03826
677Linda Metcalf2:19-cv-03836
678Matilde Lopez2:19-cv-03839
679Kathleen Mirarchi2:19-cv-03841
680Wilma Miller2:19-cv-03849

Exhibit A

681Tammy Phipps2:19-cv-03863
682Melissa Konarski, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Pamela Zaccardi, Deceased2:19-cv-03869
683Patty Anderson2:19-cv-03889
684Kevin Takacs2:19-cv-03921
685Patricia E. Thomas2:19-cv-03980
686Brandon Ward2:19-cv-03987
687Darren Williams2:19-cv-04012
688Belinda Laird2:19-cv-04031
689Robert Williams2:19-cv-04036
690Gaye Young2:19-cv-04050
691Julie Long2:19-cv-04094
692Fidencio Lopez2:19-cv-04111
693Anita Loudy2:19-cv-04113
694Harold Martin2:19-cv-04125
695Fernando Martinez, Jr.2:19-cv-04130
696Sandra Detherage2:19-cv-04133
697Carol Rosenblum2:19-cv-04146
698Linda Barnett2:19-cv-04152
699Bernice Elkins, As the Representative of the Estate of Chilles Elkins, Deceased2:19-cv-04161
700Susan Payne2:19-cv-04162
701Keith Ellery2:19-cv-04166
702Kerry Bland2:19-cv-04178
703Denise Garrette2:19-cv-04188
704Josette Schaffer2:19-cv-04192
705Barbara Grant2:19-cv-04197
706Lynn Seabrook2:19-cv-04198
707Mary C. Smith2:19-cv-04202
708John Danso, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Vickie Danso, Deceased2:19-cv-04204
709Rachel Smith2:19-cv-04207
710Lawrence Lucerne2:19-cv-04209
711Rickey E. Vice2:19-cv-04211
712Sandra Mason2:19-cv-04218
713Cheryl Woody2:19-cv-04223
714Beverly McCaleb2:19-cv-04224
715Veda McDonald-Rhodes, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Andre McDonald, Deceased2:19-cv-04228
716Joanne Smith2:19-cv-04234
717Lee Spaulding2:19-cv-04238
718Diane Wood2:19-cv-04242
719Marvin Edwards2:19-cv-04248
720John Mangum2:19-cv-04263
721Robert McKim2:19-cv-04266
722Paul Shrode2:19-cv-04267

Exhibit A

723Mary Nicholson, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Winnie L. Nicholson, Deceased2:19-cv-04276
724Robert C. Lopez2:19-cv-04342
725Mary Burchett2:19-cv-04470
726Greg Cadjew2:19-cv-04473
727Anabel Campbell2:19-cv-04485
728Clarice Boutin2:19-cv-04486
729Joanna E. Campbell2:19-cv-04492
730Quinten W. Bowen2:19-cv-04497
731Michael Bowen2:19-cv-04503
732Cathleen A. Brooks2:19-cv-04504
733Don Burleson-Castillo2:19-cv-04505
734Terri L. Banfield2:19-cv-04506
735Lisa Brookshire2:19-cv-04510
736Melinda J. Burns2:19-cv-04515
737Catherine Antwine2:19-cv-04516
738Roy D. Burress2:19-cv-04517
739Jackie L. Brown2:19-cv-04518
740Joseph A. Archer2:19-cv-04519
741Margie T. Bannister2:19-cv-04528
742Danny Asti2:19-cv-04534
743Leta Bannon2:19-cv-04535
744Janice Weibley, on behalf of Elizabeth L. Boyd2:19-cv-04537
745Cassandra Bell2:19-cv-04548
746Debra Bramblett2:19-cv-04561
747Douglas Ball2:19-cv-04572
748Laquiche L. Benjamin2:19-cv-04573
749Brent Bregan2:19-cv-04574
750Sharon L. Bennett2:19-cv-04580
751Charita R. Brown2:19-cv-04586
752Johnny Brown2:19-cv-04592
753Todd Brown2:19-cv-04595
754Yvonne Abrams2:19-cv-04617
755Lisa D. Binder2:19-cv-04628
756Ricky W. Barley2:19-cv-04629
757Candy J. Bryant2:19-cv-04630
758Tammie Y. Cheatham2:19-cv-04634
759Charles A. Biondillo2:19-cv-04643
760Dennis Bunch2:19-cv-04650
761Sherman Bunnell2:19-cv-04653
762Ruth Cassidy2:19-cv-04664
763Lisa Jo Albright2:19-cv-04674
764Brian D. Alexander2:19-cv-04680
765Josephine Basey2:19-cv-04681
766Damisha L. Bishop2:19-cv-04684
767Joe Alfieri2:19-cv-04690
768Christine S. Basile2:19-cv-04700

Exhibit A

769Shirley Bass2:19-cv-04703
770Sylvia J. Cotton2:19-cv-04709
771Gerald E. Coyle2:19-cv-04719
772Alice Baxter2:19-cv-04722
773Joe Bean2:19-cv-04730
774Jackie Crawford2:19-cv-04734
775Ruth V. Cleveland2:19-cv-04735
776Anna Gonzalez, as Propоsed Representative of the Estate of Beatrice Ceja, Deceased2:19-cv-04750
777Derrick A. Cloud2:19-cv-04756
778Sharon Brewer2:19-cv-04761
779Etta M. Brewer2:19-cv-04762
780Tiena Britt2:19-cv-04773
781Joe Dehart2:19-cv-04776
782Jose Deleon2:19-cv-04781
783Twila M. Dillon2:19-cv-04790
784Richard Dismuke2:19-cv-04792
785Larry Cole2:19-cv-04798
786Joel Chapa2:19-cv-04810
787Leif E. Anderson2:19-cv-04821
788Mary Eddy2:19-cv-04825
789Dora Chatman2:19-cv-04826
790Stephen Eaton2:19-cv-04829
791David A. Ealy2:19-cv-04837
792Jack Cunningham2:19-cv-04844
793Clara C. Dacko2:19-cv-04848
794Linda Duffy2:19-cv-04862
795Jean C. Darby2:19-cv-04878
796Tina Dasher2:19-cv-04882
797Mark A. Anderson2:19-cv-04883
798Arnada F. Davis2:19-cv-04906
799Jamie Davis2:19-cv-04907
800Augusta L. Colson2:19-cv-04909
801John Elliott2:19-cv-04913
802David Andrews2:19-cv-04914
803Deborah K. Elmer2:19-cv-04918
804Lori A. Enos2:19-cv-04925
805Adela Anguiano2:19-cv-04927
806Troy Ersch2:19-cv-04932
807Theresa Cooper2:19-cv-04939
808Doris Crutchfield2:19-cv-04944
809Kevin Carr2:19-cv-04950
810Letrell Cuff2:19-cv-04951
811Robbin Carridine2:19-cv-04952
812Catherine Carroll2:19-cv-04960
813Lula M. Day2:19-cv-04961
814James F. Dean2:19-cv-04967

Exhibit A

815Pamela Fix2:19-cv-04972
816John Fry2:19-cv-04976
817Angela Clinton2:19-cv-04981
818Pat J. Evans2:19-cv-04986
819Cynthia Bonacci2:19-cv-04994
820Robin Fizhugh2:19-cv-05006
821Joyce Carvalho2:19-cv-05016
822Calvin Carver2:19-cv-05022
823Sherley L. Booker2:19-cv-05027
824Lee Booth2:19-cv-05052
825Albert V. Borboa2:19-cv-05053
826Evelyn W. Frey2:19-cv-05069
827Mary Duncan2:19-cv-05072
828Mary Jane Franklin2:19-cv-05073
829Gerardo Gallaga2:19-cv-05089
830Libia Felix2:19-cv-05094
831Charlotte Edwards2:19-cv-05097
832Amber N. Felthauser2:19-cv-05098
833Dorthy Edwards2:19-cv-05099
834Jacqualine Ferera2:19-cv-05102
835Beverly Ficklin2:19-cv-05111
836Keith Franklin2:19-cv-05112
837Walter Gaddis2:19-cv-05115
838Matilda Gagliardi2:19-cv-05119
839Barbara S. Foutty2:19-cv-05132
840Debbie A. Garcia2:19-cv-05135
841Sue A. Fink2:19-cv-05138
842Susan K. Kellar2:19-cv-05166
843Robert L. Johnson, Jr.2:19-cv-05168
844Susan K. Kelley2:19-cv-05174
845Timothy Henry2:19-cv-05177
846Angela K. Henry2:19-cv-05185
847David M. Huddleston2:19-cv-05186
848Glenda Jackson2:19-cv-05193
849Bobby G Jones2:19-cv-05196
850Darlene Huettenberger2:19-cv-05197
851Gary D. Johnson2:19-cv-05199
852Vivian Knudsen2:19-cv-05209
853Annie M Jones2:19-cv-05217
854Gordon Hills2:19-cv-05220
855Barbara A. Jones2:19-cv-05230
856Vickie L. Jones2:19-cv-05242
857Ronnie W. Johnson2:19-cv-05247
858Vickie Kemp2:19-cv-05249
859Kathleen F. Kimble2:19-cv-05263
860Michael Hurley2:19-cv-05267
861Wesley Hurt2:19-cv-05271

Exhibit A

862Billy R. Johns2:19-cv-05273
863Donna Hines2:19-cv-05275
864Virginia Johnson Gruver2:19-cv-05281
865Margaret Jordan2:19-cv-05295
866Williard I. Justice2:19-cv-05304
867Jane Krause2:19-cv-05312
868Carol M. Kristian2:19-cv-05315
869Tammy Jobe2:19-cv-05319
870Connie Ivory2:19-cv-05324
871Karen C. King2:19-cv-05327
872Jerry R. Kingery2:19-cv-05328
873Constance Gary2:19-cv-05335
874Henry H. Hessen2:19-cv-05341
875Patrick W. Lacke2:19-cv-05349
876Barton S. Hickey2:19-cv-05353
877Cinda Geerlings2:19-cv-05359
878Pamela Kazak2:19-cv-05369
879David Gilbert2:19-cv-05370
880Romona Kea2:19-cv-05375
881Phyllis j. Kinsey2:19-cv-05376
882Edward W. Gildner2:19-cv-05379
883Lisa Keith2:19-cv-05385
884Deborah Gilstrap2:19-cv-05387
885Marion Francis Keith2:19-cv-05391
886Sue Langham2:19-cv-05401
887William D. Hinshaw2:19-cv-05415
888Mark D. Hochul2:19-cv-05428
889Kathleen Lalor2:19-cv-05507
890Nancy K. Garza2:19-cv-05528
891Richard Graham2:19-cv-05544
892Louise Jones2:19-cv-05548
893June S. Grumbein2:19-cv-05558
894Sarah Holland2:19-cv-05563
895Ronald W. Grissom2:19-cv-05600
896Darren Gines2:19-cv-05608
897Milton E. Hansen, Jr.2:19-cv-05610
898Loyce A. Hampson2:19-cv-05623
899Teresa Haney2:19-cv-05636
900Linda Guzman, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Barbara Guzman, Deceased2:19-cv-05649
901Connie Gamez2:19-cv-05652
902Jesse Hales2:19-cv-05697
903Paul Glasper2:19-cv-05699
904Shelley M. Harder2:19-cv-05703
905Anne A. Headrick2:19-cv-05728
906Sandra S. Hart2:19-cv-05731
907John D. Harrison2:19-cv-05734

Exhibit A

908Melvin W. Hendryx2:19-cv-05745
909Verna Heideman2:19-cv-05750
910Derric R. Henderson2:19-cv-05773
911Jason A. Head2:19-cv-05847
912Vanessa Harper2:19-cv-05850
913Jeffrey A Heaps2:19-cv-05853
914Barbara A. Harper2:19-cv-05864
915Rhonda Leopold2:19-cv-06011
916Carol A. Lentz2:19-cv-06012
917Terica Lemon2:19-cv-06014
918Alberta Lee2:19-cv-06017
919Jerry Lawley, Jr.2:19-cv-06026
920Delois Miller2:19-cv-06069
921Gail H. Mills2:19-cv-06072
922Joseph Mirabile2:19-cv-06078
923Barbara Mire2:19-cv-06079
924Berchia M. Mitchell2:19-cv-06106
925Jason R. Mitchell2:19-cv-06110
926Alice Moore2:19-cv-06123
927Linda L. Hopkins2:19-cv-06152
928Kimberly A. Horn2:19-cv-06160
929Veronica C. Williams2:19-cv-06193
930Zane Libert, as the Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Julianna Libert, deceased2:19-cv-06198
931Jerry Winthrop2:19-cv-06213
932Joe N. Little2:19-cv-06225
933Betty J. Withrow2:19-cv-06226
934Teena Williams2:19-cv-06236
935Kevin Wilson2:19-cv-06305
936Desiree Lovins2:19-cv-06323
937Robert R. Houser2:19-cv-06349
938Judith Lambert2:19-cv-06352
939Anthony Lanas2:19-cv-06354
940Juliana Wimberly2:19-cv-06370
941Betty Lowther2:19-cv-06374
942Joseph W. Lucas2:19-cv-06376
943Candace M. Malin2:19-cv-06392
944Helen M. Martinez2:19-cv-06426
945Raul Martinez2:19-cv-06429
946Rebecca Meader2:19-cv-06437
947Shekina D. Mason2:19-cv-06439
948Jacobus Mekes2:19-cv-06443
949Sharon W. Mellott, as the Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Jerry W. Mellott, deceased2:19-cv-06445
950Deborah Mercer2:19-cv-06452
951Kym Matthews2:19-cv-06455
952Lynda Mercer2:19-cv-06456

Exhibit A

953Lena Woolfolk2:19-cv-06457
954Jessie M. Merriweather2:19-cv-06460
955Oliver T. Mihm2:19-cv-06482
956Henry G. Miles2:19-cv-06486
957Lora Wilson2:19-cv-06490
958Alexander J. Mayfield2:19-cv-06491
959Teresa Mayo2:19-cv-06495
960Arlene Miller2:19-cv-06496
961Thelma McClellen2:19-cv-06520
962Brenda McConnachie2:19-cv-06522
963Dee A. Mankins2:19-cv-06533
964Iris L. Manning2:19-cv-06534
965Grachell L. Manuel2:19-cv-06537
966Janet S. Markello2:19-cv-06540
967Douglas Worden2:19-cv-06542
968Joann C. Worden2:19-cv-06550
969Marilyn Young2:19-cv-06599
970Missouri McCann2:19-cv-06614
971Hollis Q. Moore2:19-cv-06637
972Antonio Morales2:19-cv-06641
973Anna M. Morales2:19-cv-06642
974August Morella2:19-cv-06644
975Jessie Noiel2:19-cv-06649
976Jeffrey A. Oakley2:19-cv-06656
977Norma J. Ochoa2:19-cv-06657
978Marilyn D. Ojeda2:19-cv-06660
979Mindy Oosting2:19-cv-06673
980William H. Morgan2:19-cv-06677
981Marilyn A. Palma2:19-cv-06690
982Darrell M. Papaleo2:19-cv-06693
983Betty A. Parks2:19-cv-06696
984Kay Parks2:19-cv-06697
985Maria D. Parovel2:19-cv-06699
986Deborah L Patterson2:19-cv-06706
987Lisa York-Williams2:19-cv-06712
988Shirley Murray2:19-cv-06713
989Sandy Myers2:19-cv-06721
990Renato Natal2:19-cv-06730
991Andrenette Marshall2:19-cv-06748
992Daniel Peters2:19-cv-06823
993David Peterson, Sr.2:19-cv-06827
994Leonard Nesbitt2:19-cv-06828
995Cherri D. Young2:19-cv-06837
996Rachel Martinez, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Richard Martinez, Deceased2:19-cv-06845
997Annette K. Morris2:19-cv-06862
998Neal H. Pleasant2:19-cv-06883

Exhibit A

999Adrienne Newton2:19-cv-06885
1000John Nicastro2:19-cv-06889
1001Eddie Nicholson2:19-cv-06897
1002Joyce Niemi2:19-cv-06899
1003Luis Nieves2:19-cv-06900
1004Barbara Noble2:19-cv-06911
1005Norma Wright2:19-cv-06918
1006Norman Reynolds2:19-cv-06938
1007Luis Rodriguez-Charriez2:19-cv-06947
1008Walter R. Roger2:19-cv-06950
1009James Potter2:19-cv-06962
1010Misty C. Powell2:19-cv-06966
1011Leon Rhodes and Veronica Rhodes2:19-cv-06967
1012Carolyn Powers2:19-cv-06974
1013Francis Presto2:19-cv-06981
1014Deborah A. Richard2:19-cv-06989
1015Daniel Paul2:19-cv-07003
1016Louise C. Peaco2:19-cv-07010
1017Pamela M. Pruitt2:19-cv-07022
1018Kathy Ridgeway2:19-cv-07034
1019Esteban Rojo2:19-cv-07039
1020Anthony Riley2:19-cv-07045
1021Ricky L. Wilson2:19-cv-07047
1022Annette H. Ringley2:19-cv-07049
1023Linda Roach2:19-cv-07057
1024Leona Quinn2:19-cv-07059
1025Frank Quinones2:19-cv-07065
1026Sharon Raabe2:19-cv-07069
1027Judith Robertson2:19-cv-07082
1028Martina Ramirez2:19-cv-07083
1029James Randolph2:19-cv-07104
1030Debbie M. Rankin2:19-cv-07111
1031April Rondeau2:19-cv-07119
1032Ruth Roozing-Grimsrud2:19-cv-07126
1033Manuel G. Rodriguez2:19-cv-07137
1034David B. Zarosky2:19-cv-07139
1035Brandi Peebles2:19-cv-07166
1036David Pennypacker, as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Cynthia Pennypacker, Deceased2:19-cv-07175
1037Eric D. Perkins2:19-cv-07188
1038Michael Scadden2:19-cv-07191
1039Claudia Ortega, as the Proposed Administrator of the Estate of Josefina Silva, deceased2:19-cv-07201
1040William Schiffert2:19-cv-07203
1041Sydney B. Silver2:19-cv-07206
1042Darlet A. Simile2:19-cv-07208
1043Bruce E. Simmons2:19-cv-07210

Exhibit A

1044Mary M. Simmons2:19-cv-07214
1045Ronald A. Simmons2:19-cv-07216
1046Sheryl D. Simpson2:19-cv-07218
1047Theresa Sipler2:19-cv-07222
1048Ben Schwartz2:19-cv-07238
1049Robert Smith2:19-cv-07247
1050Rita Scott, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Melvern Scott, deceased2:19-cv-07250
1051Nancy Rouseau2:19-cv-07267
1052Lisa C. Rowlette2:19-cv-07272
1053Amanda Scrimpsher2:19-cv-07300
1054Roger Zickefoose2:19-cv-07306
1055Scott E. Shaner2:19-cv-07348
1056Raymond L. Shaner2:19-cv-07349
1057Anita L. Shank2:19-cv-07352
1058Carla A. Smith2:19-cv-07358
1059Debra Sheffey2:19-cv-07372
1060Gloria Sheppard2:19-cv-07382
1061Patricia A. Smith2:19-cv-07383
1062Andrew Sherrod2:19-cv-07388
1063Sharon Smith2:19-cv-07389
1064Valorie Sherrod2:19-cv-07390
1065Annette H. Shook2:19-cv-07400
1066Ysleta Smith2:19-cv-07403
1067Arlene Sidenstick2:19-cv-07425
1068David A. Soliz2:19-cv-07493
1069Gilbert J. Sosa2:19-cv-07500
1070Christina Spaulding2:19-cv-07509
1071Heidi McGee2:19-cv-07516
1072Troy McKelvy2:19-cv-07521
1073Shanda M. Meacacke2:19-cv-07543
1074Alan R. Sussman2:19-cv-07552
1075Wendy Swartz2:19-cv-07555
1076Brenda Swift2:19-cv-07558
1077Dawn Takacs2:19-cv-07560
1078Kermit E. Tate2:19-cv-07563
1079Tony E. Taylor2:19-cv-07569
1080Ronald Perrin2:19-cv-07572
1081Barbara A. Rauenzahn2:19-cv-07574
1082Janet Reardon2:19-cv-07580
1083Elspeth A. Teed2:19-cv-07584
1084Michael B. Tenore2:19-cv-07587
1085Ruby M. Terrasas2:19-cv-07589
1086Pamela D. Terry2:19-cv-07590
1087Miriam Thomas2:19-cv-07597
1088Willie Thomas2:19-cv-07600
1089Zoanthony M. Thomas2:19-cv-07601

Exhibit A

1090Kim Sposato2:19-cv-07621
1091Dean St. John2:19-cv-07624
1092Diane Robinson, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of James Stacker, Deceased2:19-cv-07627
1093Daniel M. Russell2:19-cv-07633
1094Carrie L. Stark2:19-cv-07634
1095Courtney Stark2:19-cv-07636
1096Rose Starr2:19-cv-07639
1097Sally D. Reed2:19-cv-07642
1098Gail E. Sachs2:19-cv-07653
1099Sandra Steen2:19-cv-07658
1100Sheila K. Sain2:19-cv-07661
1101Yvette Sanders2:19-cv-07673
1102Vashon Stephens2:19-cv-07676
1103Sonja F. Anthony2:19-cv-07681
1104Madge E. Reed2:19-cv-07701
1105Dea Reed2:19-cv-07707
1106Linda K. Reed2:19-cv-07717
1107Shasta Cook2:19-cv-07725
1108Norma Fuentes2:19-cv-07739
1109Donna J. Renard2:19-cv-07763
1110Mark E. Lynch2:19-cv-07771
1111Tammy Sateriale2:19-cv-07793
1112Arnoldo Sauceda2:19-cv-07799
1113Rodney Stewart2:19-cv-07800
1114Ricky Stewart2:19-cv-07804
1115Nicholas Savini2:19-cv-07825
1116Lennie Stowes2:19-cv-07851
1117Joan V. Streek2:19-cv-07857
1118Fred Stuhlemmer, As Proposed Representative of the Estate of Leah Stuhlemmer, Deceased2:19-cv-07864
1119Eric T. Whitfield2:19-cv-07871
1120Susan Reitz2:19-cv-07879
1121Nowell E. Renth2:19-cv-07884
1122Silvia Retana2:19-cv-07886
1123Kevin Wiggs2:19-cv-07893
1124Sylvia Thrower2:19-cv-07898
1125Mona L. Timms2:19-cv-07901
1126Robert W. Tonini2:19-cv-07908
1127Jeffrey L. Montgomery2:19-cv-07929
1128Linda Palafox2:19-cv-07955
1129Mary N. Vieyra2:19-cv-07990
1130Mary Vincent2:19-cv-08003
1131Geraldine Virges2:19-cv-08004
1132Carmen Vitello2:19-cv-08007
1133Lois Torres2:19-cv-08013
1134Randy E. Totenhagen2:19-cv-08017

Exhibit A

1135Kimberly Wilfong2:19-cv-08028
1136Michael Waddy2:19-cv-08035
1137Kimberly A. Willhite2:19-cv-08043
1138Jeanette R. Wadholm-Williams2:19-cv-08045
1139Brycelynn Wakkukait2:19-cv-08095
1140Bonnie S. Walburn2:19-cv-08097
1141Dee N. Trejo2:19-cv-08141
1142Donna M. Tritto2:19-cv-08150
1143Arthur L. Waller2:19-cv-08151
1144Joseph Walsh2:19-cv-08155
1145Wanda J. Turnage2:19-cv-08200
1146Donald Turnbow2:19-cv-08202
1147Donald W. Vanadore Jr.2:19-cv-08253
1148Roberta L. Vankuren2:19-cv-08259
1149Linda I. Ruffin2:19-cv-08279
1150Jerome G. Washington2:19-cv-08291
1151Cherry Watson as Proposed Representative of the Estate of Gary E. Watson, Deceased2:19-cv-08323
1152Betty Webb2:19-cv-08430
1153Peggy Wehr2:19-cv-08436
1154Daniel E. Varner2:19-cv-08449
1155Maria Welch2:19-cv-08503
1156Jimmy Welch2:19-cv-08505
1157Cody Weldon2:19-cv-08506
1158Cornelius Westbrook2:19-cv-08509
1159Audrey M. Werner2:19-cv-08547
1160Kathleen West2:19-cv-08562
1161Joseph White Sr.2:19-cv-08573
1162Sandra E. White2:19-cv-08601
1163Robert Acosta2:19-cv-08709
1164Eugene Fisher2:19-cv-08838
1165Mary Bellmore, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Donn Bellmore, Deceased2:19-cv-10047
1166Katie Ware2:19-cv-10141
1167Michael Davis2:19-cv-11777
1168Dennis Thompson2:19-cv-12040
1169Janet Burau2:19-cv-12611
1170Rose Campbell2:19-cv-12613
1171Betty Jessie2:19-cv-12618
1172William Sayles2:19-cv-12628
1173Robert Brantley2:19-cv-20086
1174Brenda Kellam2:20-cv-07294
1175Kathleen Anderson2:20-cv-07343
1176Sandra Loesche2:20-cv-07344
1177Alex Montiel2:20-cv-07345
1178Dolores Payne2:20-cv-07348
1179Glenda Kelsey2:20-cv-20741

Exhibit A

1180Sheila Kindoll2:20-cv-20742
1181Linda K Shierling2:20-cv-20743

Notes

1
All references to Rules herein are to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
2
At the request of the parties, the deadline for Plaintiffs to file responses to CMO No. 65 was extended to March 31, 2022, and then to June 30, 2022. See CMO No. 67, at § I.D, ECF No. 747; CMO No. 70, at ¶ B, ECF No. 769. The deadline for the AZ Defendants to oppose each plaintiff‘s response was extended to May 15, 2022, then to August 16, 2022, and then to October 17, 2022. See CMO No. 67, at § I.D, ECF No. 747; CMO No. 70, at ¶ B, ECF No. 769; CMO No. 78, at ¶ A, ECF No. 841.
3
Plaintiffs note that the version of Rule 4 quoted in MCI Telecomms is no longer applicable after an amendment in 1993. The amendment removed “good cause” as an absolute prerequisite for an extension of service. However, as explained above, the good cause standard still exists in Rule 4(m)Rule 4(m).
4
Though not relevant in these cases, the Court notes that AZLP, AZPLP, and Merck agreed to accept service of a Complaint by email at PPIComplaints@icemiller.com. CMO No. 27, at § I.D, ECF No. 260
5
In June 2018, the parties entered into a tolling agreement concerning the statute of limitations. In order to obtаin the benefit of tolling under the tolling agreement, a claimant had to provide the following information to all defendants: name and date of birth of the PPI user, name(s) of any derivative claimant(s), city and state of residence, date of first PPI use, date of last PPI use, alleged injury, and name of claimant‘s counsel. The Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee was to compile this information and submit it to the defendants on an Excel spreadsheet on a monthly basis. See Stip. Regarding Tolling of Stats. of Lims., ECF No. 232, at 1-2. The data required to be provided to all defendants in the tolling agreement did not identify specific defendants whose product(s) were allegedly used by individual plaintiffs.
6
The AZ Defendants also argue that because Plaintiffs did not address their reasons fоr untimely service (and instead relied chiefly on arguments concerning waiver), Plaintiffs’ reply to CMO 65 failed to comply with a court order, requiring dismissal of their cases on that independent basis. See, e.g., No. 19-cv-04209, ECF No. 10 at 6. The AZ Defendants cite certain Poulis factors to support this argument. Id. at 10. As explained above, the Court has considered Plaintiffs’ lack of an explanation in its discussion of Rule 4(m) and discretionary extensions.
7
The Court also notes that even if, contrary to the record, the AZ Defendants had filed a short form answer in any of the cases at issue here, the AZ Defendants’ reservation of rights from CMO No. 7 would mean that service was not waived.
8
To the extent Plaintiffs in the cases identified in Exhibit A hereto have raised in their briefing ‍​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌​​​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‍any arguments not expressly addressed herein, the Court has considered and rejected them.

Case Details

Case Name: MOORE v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Court Name: District Court, D. New Jersey
Date Published: May 4, 2023
Citation: 2:18-cv-07351
Docket Number: 2:18-cv-07351
Court Abbreviation: D.N.J.
Read the detailed case summary
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In