History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. . Hobbs
77 N.C. 65
N.C.
1877
Check Treatment

The defendants demurrer to the complaint. His Honor overruled the demurrer and gave judgment for plaintiff, and the defendants appealed. The causes assigned for demurrer do not appear in the complaint, and therefore can be taken advantage of only by answer.

The case will be remanded, to the end that the defendants may answer, and on failure to do which there should be judgment for plaintiff.

We call attention to the fact that C. C. P., sec. 91, requires that the "complaint" should contain "a plain and concise statement of the facts constituting the cause of action." It may be that the complaint in this case is at fault in that particular. If so, it may be amended by leave.

There was no error in overruling the demurrer, but there was error in giving judgment for the demand without allowing an answer. Bat. Rev., ch. 17, sec. 131.

Case remanded. Each party will pay his own costs in this Court.

PER CURIAM. Remanded.

Cited: S. c., 79 N.C. 535; Womble v. Leach, 83 N.C. 86; Dills v.Hampton, 92 N.C. 569; Kiff v. Weaver, 94 N.C. 278; Hornthal v. Burwell,109 N.C. 18; Burton v. Mfg. Co., 132 N.C. 19; Allred v. Smith, 135 N.C. 457.

(67)

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. . Hobbs
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Jun 5, 1877
Citation: 77 N.C. 65
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.