History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moore v. . Boone
202 N.C. 838
N.C.
1932
Check Treatment

Civil action to prevent waste, etc.

From a judgment for the plaintiff rendered on the "pleadings and the evidence introduced and admitted by the defendants," the defendant, T. H. Brown, appeals. A consideration of the record proper, to which we are limited in the absence of a statement of case on appeal, In re Bank, ante, 251; CasualtyCo. v. Green, 200 N.C. 535, 157 S.E. 797, does not show that appellant has overcome the presumption against error. Bailey v. McKay, 198 N.C. 638,152 S.E. 893. To prevail on appeal, he who alleges error must successfully handle the laboring oar. Mangum v. Winstead, ante, 252;Frazier v. R. R., ante, 11.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Moore v. . Boone
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Mar 9, 1932
Citation: 202 N.C. 838
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.