History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mooney v. Pinover
224 A.D. 863
N.Y. App. Div.
1928
Check Treatment

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint for insufficiency, and upon the ground of a misjoinder of parties, or, in the alternative, to make the complaint more definite and certain, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to dismiss complaint granted, *864with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiffs to plead over within twenty days upon payment of said costs. We reach this determination upon the ground that the complaint is vague and uncertain with regard to the rights of the parties joined, both plaintiffs and defendants; and in so far as a cause of action on contract is attempted to be stated, it seems that there are intermingled allegations tending to indicate a cause of action in tort. While this latter conclusion would not necessarily require a dismissal of the complaint, it does affect the right of the individual plaintiff to sue, as well as the right to obtain a judgment against the individual defendants. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mooney v. Pinover
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1928
Citation: 224 A.D. 863
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.