167 S.W.2d 871 | Ark. | 1943
This is the second appeal in this case. The opinion in the first appeal was rendered on October 28, 1940, in the case of Moseley v. Moon,
In the case of Bank of Russellville v. Walthall,
From an examination of the transcript in the present appeal, it is clear that appellant has not complied *136 with 8246 of Pope's Digest, which is the same as 6290 of Crawford Moses' Digest, and therefore the cause should be affirmed.