Moody v. State

Oct 2, 1997
90014
Reporters:
,
Before:
Kogan, Overton, Shaw, Harding, Anstead, Wells, Grimes (per curiam)

Kenneth Harold Moody, Blountstown, Pro Se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General and Dale E. Tarpley, Assistant Attorney General, ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‍Tampa, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Moody v. State, 696 So.2d 797 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), which expressly and directly conflicts with decisions of the Third and Fourth ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‍District Courts of Appeal. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in State v. Hudson, 698 ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‍So.2d 831 (Fla.1997).

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

WELLS, J., dissents with an opinion, in which GRIMES, J., concurs.

WELLS, Justice, dissenting.

I must dissent for the ‍​​​​‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌​​​​​​‌‌​​​‌​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​​​‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​‌​‌​‌​‍same reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Hudson, 698 So.2d 831 (Fla.1997).

GRIMES, J., concurs.