History
  • No items yet
midpage
Moody v. Moody
705 So. 2d 708
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 1998
|
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Sarah Moody petitions this court for a writ of mandamus. She and her husband are currently parties to a dissolution action in Nassau County. Mrs. Moody has moved for the disqualification of the presiding judge and the motion has been pending for over four months.

A writ of mandamus may issue to require a timely ruling on a matter pending before a lower tribunal. See Flagship National Bank v. Testa, 429 So.2d 69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). The purpose of the writ is not to require a particular outcome, only that action be taken. Kramp v. Fagan, 568 So.2d 479 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). We note that Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.160(e) contemplates an “immediate ruling” on a motion for judicial disqualification.

*709The petition for writ of mandamus is granted and the Honorable Bill Parsons is directed to render an order on the motion for his disqualification within ten days of issu-anee of this opinion.

BARFIELD, C.J., and WEBSTER and LAWRENCE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Moody v. Moody
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 13, 1998
Citation: 705 So. 2d 708
Docket Number: No. 97-4784
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.