History
  • No items yet
midpage
Montgomery v. State
1899 Ga. LEXIS 510
| Ga. | 1899
|
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

The only error complained of being the overruling of the motion for a new trial, based on the ground that the evidence was not sufficient to sustain the verdict, and there being enough evidence to warrant the same, the trial judge did not err in refusing the motion. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Montgomery v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 28, 1899
Citation: 1899 Ga. LEXIS 510
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.