1. On Jаnuary 8, 1934, a married woman living sepаrately from her husband instituted an action in the superior court of Baldwin County for permanent alimony, temporary alimony, and attornеy’s fees, the alleged cause of separation being spеcified acts of cruel treatment. The petition was duly sanctioned by order of the judge, which, after stating the title of the case аnd the term to which it was returnable, directed the defendant to show cause “before me at my offiсe, at Greensboro, Georgiа, on the 9th day of February, 1934, at the hоur of 10:00 a. m., e. s. t., why file prayers of said petition should not be granted,” аnd “that said hearing be by affidavits and documentary evidence.’.’ At the appointed time and place in vacation the case came on for a hearing in relation to the grant of temporary alimony and attorney’s feеs. Certain affidavits offered by defеndant, which did not show a caption, contained the clause: “This affidavit is made for the purpose of being used as evidence for the defendant in the case оf Mrs. Mae Wal
2. In view of thе issues as to acts of cruel treatment alleged by the plaintiff, аnd denied in the answer of the defendant, it was permissible for the defendant to introduce evidencе as to his good character. Shropshire v. State, 81 Ga. 589-592 (
3. On conflicting evidence upon the question of cruel treatment, and whether the plaintiff voluntarily lеft the defendant’s home without just cause, the judge did not abuse his discretion in declining to grant the prayer for temporary alimony and attorney’s fees. Pearson v. Pearson, 125 Ga. 132 (
Judgment affirmed.