545 So. 2d 785 | Ala. Civ. App. | 1989
This is a workmen's compensation case.
After an ore tenus hearing, the trial court found that the employee failed to give timely notice to the employer of an accident or alleged injury which occurred in June 1987. The trial court then held that the employee did not sustain his burden of proof so as to entitle him to recover under the workmen's compensation laws of Alabama. The employee appeals. We affirm.
On appeal the employee contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by failing to include in his order findings of fact and conclusions of law sufficient to comply with Ala. Code (1975), §
Section
Further, other issues raised by the employee on appeal need not be addressed. This is so because of the lack of proper authority cited for the employee's argument. Hysmith v. Grimes,
In view of the above, we have no alternative but to affirm.
AFFIRMED.
INGRAM, P.J., and ROBERTSON, J., concur. *786