18 F.2d 578 | 6th Cir. | 1927
As to the matter of criminal punishment, we announced our conclusion that the record was sufficient to support the punishment imposed. 13 F.(2d) 705, 706. Upon rehearing and further reflection, we are led to the opposite conclusion. It is true that the petition asked that an attach-
That case may very well be distinguished, and some things said may be plausibly pronounced dicta; the practice, perhaps, particularly in patent and bankruptcy eases, by which the respondent’s conduct is presented to the court, which may, according to its judgment, impose a punishment of a criminal character to vindicate the authority of the court’s order, or of a remedial character to compel performance or to make compensation, or both punitive and remedial, is a practice very convenient, and, at least in patent cases, upheld by familiar instances in the lower courts; but, as we understand the principles of decision in the Gompers Case, we feel that we are constrained by them to hold that a merely punitive sentence cannot be imposed in or collateral to a civil proceeding until after the respondent has fairly been given to understand that such a result is sought by the complaining party, or by the the United States, or is contemplated by the court.
It results that our former order in this respect must be set aside, and so much of the order below as directs a fine to be paid to the United States must he vacated; in other respects, our former order is not disturbed.