130 N.Y.S. 581 | N.Y. App. Div. | 1911
This is an action for'personal- injuries alleged to have been caused by the defendant’s negligence. Upon the merits we deem it sufficient to say that the evidence presented a plain case for the jury, both as to the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence. At the close of the evidence the decision of a motion to dismiss the complaint was reserved by the.court without objection and the case was submitted to the jury, who were unable to agree, whereupon the motion to dismiss was renewed and the decision of it again reserved by the court. Thereafter the court made an order dismissing the complaint on the merits. The respondent takes the point that the appellant cannot review the ruling for want of an exception.
There was no way known to our practice by which the plaintiff coiild have taken an exception to the dismissal of the complaint. An exception could not have been noted in the minutes, because the motion was not granted at the trial. There was no decision to which an exception could be filed. The court made an order dismissing the complaint and upon
The judgment and order should be reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event.
Ingraham, P. J.,-McLaughlin, LauGhlin and Dowling, JJ., concurred.
Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.