Mollet v. MolletMollet v. MolletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New YorkOct 24, 2012Check Treatment (2)Versions:99 A.D.3d 1007952 N.Y.2d 470 ” ’ “In order to modify an existing custody or visitation arrangement, there must be a showing that there has been a change in circumstances such that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child” ’ ” (Matter of Francois v Grimm, 84 AD3d 1082 [2011], quoting Matter of Peralta v Irrizary, 76 AD3d 561, 562 [2010]; see Family Ct Act § 652). “The best interests of the child are determined by a review of the totality of the circumstances” (Matter of Garcia v Fountain, 82 AD3d 979, 980 [2011]). Here, the Family Court‘s award of sole legal and physical custody of the subject child to the mother has a sound and substantial basis in the record and will not be disturbed (see Matter of McDonough v McDonough, 73 AD3d 1067, 1068 [2010]; Matter of Tercjak v Tercjak, 49 AD3d 772 [2008]). The father‘s remaining contentions are without merit. Eng, P.J., Skelos, Lott and Cohen, JJ., concur.