No. 127; No. 480 | SCOTUS | Jan 7, 1924

Per Curiam. Mr. Clarence Lippel, with whom Mr. Arch A. Young and Mr. Carl G. Mullin were on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 127. Mr. Saul Praeger, with whom Mr. Joseph N. Ülman and Mr. G. Tyler Smith were, on the brief, for plaintiff in error in No. 480. Mr. Alexander Armstrong and ■ Mr. Lindsay C. Spencer appeared for defendant in error.

Affirmed with costs upon, the authority of: (1) Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania, 258 U.S. 403" date_filed="1922-04-10" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Vigliotti v. Pennsylvania">258 U. S. 403; (2) Forsyth v. Hammond, 166 U.S. 506" date_filed="1897-04-19" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Forsyth v. Hammond">166 U. S. 506, 518; Commissioners v. Bancroft, 203 U.S. 112" date_filed="1906-11-05" court="SCOTUS" case_name="Commissioners of Wicomico County v. Bancroft">203 U. S. 112, 118-119; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Arkansas, 235 U.S. 350" date_filed="1914-12-07" court="SCOTUS" case_name="St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Arkansas">235 U. S. 350, 362.

© 2024 Midpage AI does not provide legal advice. By using midpage, you consent to our Terms and Conditions.