119 Wash. 25 | Wash. | 1922
— This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial in a case where the respondent was plaintiff and the appellant was defendant. Upon a former trial of the same case, a verdict was also given in favor of the appellant and a new trial was thereupon granted.
It is contended by the appellant that the lower court abused its discretion in granting the new trial where, there had already been two trials. We do not think that this can be said to be such an abuse of discretion as would justify the interference of this court.
It is next contended that, inasmuch as the order granting a new trial recited that the court “being of the opinion that a new trial should be granted for
The judgment is affirmed.
Parker, C. J., Main, and Mackintosh, JJ., concur.