Mobley v. DubrayMobley v. Dubray
Contrary to petitioner‘s assertion, the determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report, related documentation and photographs and testimony adduced at the hearing (see Matter of Shankle v Goord, 45 AD3d 1084, 1085 [2007]). Petitioner‘s denial of the allegations created a credibility issue for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Brown v Selsky, 49 AD3d 1108 [2008]). We have examined petitioner‘s remaining contentions, including his claims that the misbehavior report was defective and the hearing was untimely, and, to the extent preserved, find them to be unavailing.
Mercure, J.P., Carpinello, Rose, Malone Jr. and Kavanagh, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.