History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mobley v. City of Monroe
140 S.E. 516
Ga. Ct. App.
1927
Check Treatment
B'loodworth, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The *366petition as amended set out no cause of action against either defendant, and the court properly sustained the demurrers and dismissed the petition. City of Rome v. Cheney, 114 Ga. 194 (39 S. E. 933, 55 L. E. A. 221); Etheredge v. Central of Ga. Ry. Co., 122 Ga. 853 (50 S. E. 1003); Brown v. Panola Light and Power Co., 137 Ga. 352; Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Corbett, 150 Ga. 747, 749 (105 S. E. 358), and cit.; Seaboard Air-Line Ry. Co. v. Young, 20 Ga. App. 291 (93 S. E. 29), and cit.; Macon, Dublin & Savannah R. Co. v. Jordan, 34 Ga. App. 350, 352 (129 S. E. 443), and cit.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mobley v. City of Monroe
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Nov 16, 1927
Citation: 140 S.E. 516
Docket Number: 18349
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.