History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mitchell v. State
773 So. 2d 1250
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2000
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Willie Mitchell appeals the denial of his rule 3.800 motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm but remand for correction of Mitchell’s record.

The trial court was correct in finding that the decision of State v. Thompson, 750 So.2d 643 (Fla.1999), has no effect on Mitchell’s sentence and we affirm on that basis. Additionally, the State concedes that it was error to classify the defendant as an habitual violent felony offender. While it is clear from the record that Mitchell qualified at time of sentencing as an habitual offender, he should not have been classified as an habitual violent offender where the predicate out-of-state offenses were not themselves violent felonies according to section 775.084(l)(b), Florida Statutes (1999). Mitchell’s sentence remains unaffected by this change and we therefore affirm; we remand only to ensure that Mitchell’s record is corrected to reflect designation as an habitual felony offender.

Affirmed; remanded for correction.

Case Details

Case Name: Mitchell v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 13, 2000
Citation: 773 So. 2d 1250
Docket Number: No. 3D00-2693
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.