midpage

Mitchell v. StateMitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 20, 1991
No. 91-00680
Versions:590 So. 2d 549
1991 WL 272655
1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13258
PER Cl/EHAM.

Appellant challenges special conditions nine through sixteen, eighteen and nineteen of the probationary portion of the sentence he received when he pled guilty to violations of his original probation. The written order of probation imposed the same terms and conditions of his original probationary term, which was revoked in this case. Only one of the special conditions, however, was orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing on the probation revocation. We therefore strike the special conditions referenced above, because the court did not pronounce them at sentencing. See Williams v. State, 542 So.2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and SCHEB and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mitchell v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 20, 1991
Citations: 590 So. 2d 549; 1991 WL 272655; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13258; No. 91-00680
Docket Number: No. 91-00680
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In