midpage

Mitchell v. StateMitchell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Dec 20, 1991
No. 91-00680
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
Eham
PER Cl/EHAM.

Appellant challenges special conditions nine through sixteen, eighteen and nineteen ‍​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍of the probationary portion of the sentence he received when he pled guilty to violations of his original probation. The written order ‍​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍of probation imposed the same terms and conditions of his original probationary term, which was revoked in this case. Only one of ‍​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍the special conditions, however, was orally pronounced at the sentencing hearing on the probation revocation. We therefore strike the special conditions referenced ‍​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍above, because the court did not pronounce them at sentencing. See Williams v. State, 542 So.2d 479 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). The sentence is affirmed ‍​​​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌​‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌​​​‌‌​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​​​​​​​‌​‌​​​​​​‌​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‍in all other respects.

SCHOONOVER, C.J., and SCHEB and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mitchell v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Dec 20, 1991
Citations: 590 So. 2d 549; 1991 WL 272655; 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 13258; No. 91-00680
Docket Number: No. 91-00680
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In