midpage

Mitchell v. StateMitchell v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals
Jan 30, 1990
No. 56782
Reporters:
, ,

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Case Details

Case Name: Mitchell v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 30, 1990
Citations: 783 S.W.2d 507; 1990 WL 6716; 1990 Mo. App. LEXIS 176; No. 56782
Docket Number: No. 56782
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
Log In