17 Kan. 563 | Kan. | 1877
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The plaintiff in error claims the action of the court below was erroneous, first, because the attachment was discharged, and, second, because the levy under the execution was vacated and set aside. We have examined the affidavits introduced on the hearing of the motion to discharge the attachment, and
The order of the district court setting aside the levy under the execution, is reversed.