Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if the original contract had not been under seal the evidence offered would not be sufficient to show that the same had been modified by a subsequent parol contract.
Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, MILLER and CARDOZO, JJ. Absent: WERNER, J. *Page 670
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
