History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc.
32 Ala. App. 42
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1945
|
Check Treatment

In this case the purported assignments of error are typed on a separate sheet of paper and attached to a page of the transcript with two metal fasteners, ordinarily known as gem clips.

Supreme Court Rule 1, Code 1940, Tit. 7 appendix, provides: "In assigning errors, it shall be sufficient to state concisely, in writing, in what the error consists, which assignment must be written upon the transcript * * *."

For the sake of the security and permanency of the records, the appellate courts have cautiously guarded the requirements of this rule. Skinner v. Jackson, 28 Ala. App. 227, 182 So. 92; Pugh v. Hardman, 151 Ala. 248, 44 So. 389; Hunter v. Louisville N. R. Co., 150 Ala. 594, 43 So. 802, 9 L.R.A., N.S., 848; E. W. Gates Lumber Co. v. Givens, 181 Ala. 670, 61 So. 330; Moon v. Butler Co., 9 Ala. App. 438, 62 So. 1019.

The judgment from which this appeal is taken will be affirmed for want of assignments of error as required.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Mitchell v. Marshall County Livestock Market, Inc.
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 13, 1945
Citation: 32 Ala. App. 42
Docket Number: 8 Div. 453.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.