History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mishkin v. Mishkin
266 A.D. 992
N.Y. App. Div.
1943
Check Treatment

No opinion. Present — Townley, Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.; Dore, J., dissents and votes to reverse on the ground that the issue whether plaintiff intended to waive her right to the weekly payments in question is an issue of fact to be determined after a trial and should not be disposed of as an issue of law on motion addressed to these pleadings.

Case Details

Case Name: Mishkin v. Mishkin
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 12, 1943
Citation: 266 A.D. 992
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.