History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mirna Rodriquez v. Eric Fanning
697 F. App'x 225
| 4th Cir. | 2017
|
Check Treatment
|
Docket

*1 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. Jenkins, Jr., BYNUM & JENKINS, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Kimere J. Kimball, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mirna Rodriquez appeals the district court’s orders deeming the Appellee’s statement of undisputed facts as admitted and denying reconsideration, and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Rodriquez’s claims of discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriquez v. Fanning , No. 1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Case Details

Case Name: Mirna Rodriquez v. Eric Fanning
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Sep 21, 2017
Citation: 697 F. App'x 225
Docket Number: 17-1083
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.