46 Iowa 179 | Iowa | 1877
Evidence was introduced both as to the grounds to vacate, and upon the validity of the defense, and in our opinion the ruling of the court below was correct on both grounds.
The evidence as to the defendant’s sickness, and his incapacity to look after his business interests, at the time of, and before the default, is not of such satisfactory character as to warrant us in interfering with the judgment for that reason. The same may be said as to the evidence upon the validity of the defense. There is no such clear and satisfactory showing that defendant had a good defense as to warrant us in reversing the judgment. We need not set out or review the evidence.
Affirmed.