Mintz v. Supreme Court of California, 494 U.S. 1025

Mintz v. Supreme Court of California

494 U.S. 1025 | SCOTUS | 1990

Lead Opinion

Sup. Ct. Cal. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until April 9, 1990, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.

Dissenting Opinion

Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall,

dissenting.

For the reasons expressed in Brown v. Herald Co., 464 U. S. 928 (1983), we would deny the petition for writ of certiorari without reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.