Mintz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States

12 N.E.2d 569 | NY | 1937

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Judgment affirmed, with costs. Even if there were error in the form of the two specific questions submitted to the jury such error does not constitute reversible error when the charge as a whole is considered. No opinion.

Concur: CRANE, Ch. J., HUBBS, LOUGHRAN, FINCH and RIPPEY, JJ. Dissenting: LEHMAN and O'BRIEN, JJ.