History
  • No items yet
midpage
Minthorne v. Tompkins
2 Paige Ch. 102
New York Court of Chancery
1830
Check Treatment
The Chancellor

decided that the-lllth rule "did not apply to the case of a sale under ah interlocutory order of the court; that in .such a case, the 'deed might be executed beforeenrolment. But-if the decree was final as to the whole subject matter of the sale, that it must be enrolled before any. conveyance could be executed ¡ although, as to other branches of the suit, another decree might be necessary before the cause was finally disposed of by the court. And that if a bill was dismissed with costs as to one defendant, the decree must be enrolled be*103fore any execution could issue thereon. And that the enrolment of any subsequent decree between other parties, or as to other matters, must be made by a continuance on the record of the first enrolment.

Case Details

Case Name: Minthorne v. Tompkins
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: Mar 20, 1830
Citation: 2 Paige Ch. 102
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.