65 Iowa 67 | Iowa | 1884
In the former instruction, the jury are told in effect that, if plaintiff failed to object to the payments to Yalentine within a reasonable time after the statement and vouchers were sent to it by defendants and received by it, its delay in this respect should be treated as a ratification of the payments, and would defeat a recovery; while the doctrine of the latter instruction is that such silence would not amount to a ratification of the payments, unless it had full knowledge at
For the errors pointed out the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause will be remanded for a new trial.
Reversed.