Ming-Fai Jon v. WagerMing-Fai Jon v. Wager
Caesar and Napoli, P.C., New York, NY (Kelsey M. Crowley of counsel), for appellants.
James G. Bilello (Russo & Tambasco, Melville, NY [Yamile R. Al-Sullami], of counsel), for respondents.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kathy J. King, J.), dated January 24, 2018. The order denied the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Ming-Fai Jon.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability insofar as asserted by the plaintiff Ming-Fai Jon is granted.
The plaintiff Ming-Fai Jon (hereinafter the injured plaintiff) allegedly was injured when a motorcycle he was operating collided with a vehicle operated by the defendant Lucia Wager and leased by the defendant William Wager (hereinafter together the defendants). The collision took place at the intersection of Avenue O and West 6th Street in Brooklyn. At the time of the collision, the injured plaintiff was traveling east on Avenue O, and Lucia Wager was traveling west on Avenue O and turning left onto southbound West 6th Street. Subsequently, the injured plaintiff, and his wife suing derivatively, commenced this action against the defendants and another party. The plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability insofar as asserted by the injured plaintiff. The Supreme Court denied the motion. The plaintiffs appeal.
Pursuant to
Here, the plaintiffs established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that Lucia Wager violated
Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability insofar as asserted by the injured plaintiff.
BALKIN, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER and MALTESE, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Aprilanne Agostino
Clerk of the Court