History
  • No items yet
midpage
Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc.
639 F.3d 11
1st Cir.
2011
Check Treatment
Docket

BRIAN K. MILWARD AND LINDA J. MILWARD, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. ACUITY SPECIALTY PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 09-2270

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

March 22, 2011

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on March 22, 2011 is amended as follows:

On page 18, lines 9-10, “consistent with causality” is changed to “which although not statistically significant was consistent with causality“.

On page 19, lines 1-2, “cause the type of chromosomal damage characteristic of APL” is changed to “cause the general types of cellular damage that are known to cause APL“.

On page 29, lines 5-9, “in which the few studies that differentiate between AML and APL do not offer conclusive statistically significant evidence either way, in part because the rarity of APL makes it nearly impossible to perform a large enough study” is changed to “in which there is a lack of statistically significant epidemiological evidence, and in which the rarity of APL and difficulties of data collection in the United States make it very difficult to perform an epidemiological study of the causes of APL that would yield statistically significant results“.

On page 29, footnote 18, lines 1-2, “is not contested by defendants, and it” is deleted.

Case Details

Case Name: Milward v. Acuity Specialty Products Group, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Date Published: Apr 13, 2011
Citation: 639 F.3d 11
Docket Number: 09-2270
Court Abbreviation: 1st Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In