History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mills v. Sweeney
175 A.D. 914
N.Y. App. Div.
1916
Check Treatment

Order reversed, without costs, and motion for temporary injunction granted, restraining defendant pendente lite from publishing a notice that questions Hos. 1 and 3 will be submitted to a vote of the electors of the city *915of Buffalo at the coming general election and from incurring any expense on account of the city of Buffalo in the publication of same, and from performing any official act toward submitting the questions referred to to the voters of said city at said election. Held, that the common council had no authority to adopt the ordinance and it has not been validated by the new charter.* All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Merrell, J., who dissented and voted for affirmance.

See Laws of 1914, chap. 217, as amd.— [Rep,

Case Details

Case Name: Mills v. Sweeney
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 15, 1916
Citation: 175 A.D. 914
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.