History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mills v. Lux
45 Cal. 273
Cal.
1873
Check Treatment
By the Court:

We understand the original decree of partition to have established the partition line between the parties by calling *275for a fence, the location of which was also attempted to be described by courses and distances; and some portion of the fence having disappeared or been removed, the Court below heard testimony to ascertain its true location, and the evidence as to its location being conflicting in its character the determination of the matter of fact will not be disturbed on appeal.

In our opinion, in construing a decree of partition, no less than in a deed, courses and distances must yield to visible monuments.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Mills v. Lux
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1873
Citation: 45 Cal. 273
Docket Number: No. 3,576
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.